My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/04/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
02/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 4:21:57 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 1:06:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
02/04/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />L~nding a Helping Hand: What Planners Can Do <br />to Turn Around Distressed Properties <br /> <br />By Dwight H. Merriam, FAICP <br /> <br />"When things go wrong, you'll fi~d they usually go .on getting worse for some time; <br />but whenthings once start going right they often go on getting better and better." <br /> <br />These words by C.S. Lewis have meaning for <br />planners today, who have a role to playas <br />turnaround agents. There are opportunities <br />with distressed properties to turn them <br />into beneficial uses, but in most instances <br />some type of zoning relief will be necessary. . <br />It is axiomatic that distressed properties <br />are likely to be older properties that are <br />physically, functionally, and economically <br />obsolescent in some form. Along with such <br />obsolescence typically comes the unhappy <br />status of being a nonconforming use. <br />And along with that comes the inability <br />to expand or alter the use because one or <br />more of the dimensional requirements at <br />the site have been exceeded orthe use <br />proposed is simply not permitted. . . <br />In short, these older, distressed prop- <br />erties are trapped inside zoning restrictions <br />that preclude attempts to reposition them in. <br />the marketplace and return them to profit- <br />ability. Essentially, what planners must do <br />is figure out how to respect local plans, con- <br />form redevelopment to the neighborhood as <br />it is and is evolving, and add enough loose- <br />ness to the jointsofthe zoning require- <br />ments to enable the owners and developers <br />of distressed properties tomeetthe market. <br />If you have ever seen extreme jugglers-'-like <br />one who juggles a running chainsaw, rock, . <br />and flaming torc~-you will have a sense pf <br />how challenging, and dangerous,this can <br />be. <br />The alternatives for relief are several. <br />They start with the most conventional ap- <br />proaches and run to the possibility,of a, <br />new type of zone, created especially for the <br />recent credit crisis and distress in the real <br />estate economy. <br /> <br />CONVENTIONAL REZONING <br />Usua~ly, the best place to start is in the <br />world of the status quo, the as-of-right, <br />and the zoning ordinance as it exists. If you <br />. have an underdeveloped, older group of <br />apartments that is economically distressed <br />and the zoning allows a higher density in a <br />preferable layout, then an as-of-right appli- <br />cation would be the typical first choice. The <br />instances where this is possible are few and <br />far between. <br />Seattle is one good example: It has re- <br />zoned property in distresSed areas to enable <br />more intensive deyelopfnent. Here is how <br />Seattle described thesituation: " . . . the <br />neighborhood plan covers an area that has <br />been included in a City sponsored neighlJor- <br />hood planning program because of the pres- <br />ence of economically distressed areas and <br />support forthe rezones has been demon- <br /> <br />strated through the neighborhood planning <br />process: . ." (Ordinance 119799, 1999). <br />To get the rezoning to the more inten- <br />sive use, the applicant must meet several <br />criteria, one of which is that the planning <br />area for the rezoning must have been "in- <br />cluded in a City sponsored neighborhood <br />planning program because of the presence <br />of at least one distressed area." <br />In St. Paul, Minnesota, the city <br />amended its Comprehensive Plim to pro- <br />pose small-area rezoning forthe Brewery/ <br />Ran-View area to create a mixed use and <br />mixed income community on reclaimed . <br />industria'lland in the mlddleofa historic <br />neighborhood (Brewery/Ran-View Small <br />Area Plan. 2000).The plan addl;!ndum in- <br />cludesasmall, 40-acre study recommend- <br />ing four areas for rezonings, some of them <br />.. single parcels. <br /> <br /> <br />88 <br /> <br />ZONINGPRACTlCE 12.09 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Ipage2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.