My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/23/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 02/23/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:31:45 PM
Creation date
2/18/2010 4:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/23/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #107 <br />APPROVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS — MOVING AND WEEKLY PARK <br />FACILITY AND TRASH MAINTENANCE <br />By: Mark Riverblood, Parks Supervisor <br />Back ground: <br />During recent months, City Council and staff have been examining all facets of providing city services, <br />including using contract labor in lieu of city staff. One of the services being evaluated this winter is the <br />snow plowing of two (2) of seven (7) cul -de -sac routes. On February 16 the Public Works Committee <br />examined two additional weekly activities that occur within parks that can be bid on by contractors by the <br />RFP process. <br />The first is mowing and trimming the 45 -acre Central Park each week during the growing season. The other <br />RFP would be for weekly trash and litter collection, (Monday's at all developed parks, and also Thursday's <br />at the more active parks). An additional activity that presently coincides with this Monday service is <br />playground safety inspections and park building and restroom cleaning on both Mondays and Thursdays. <br />In either of the above two services, if it is found that the private sector is more cost effective, one manner of <br />funding the contract(s) would be to reduce the park's seasonal worker hours commensurate with the time <br />previously dedicated to perform the work — and utilize this budget to pay the contractor(s). <br />During the Public Works Committee discussion, staff was directed to also inquire as to what the costs would <br />be to utilize either the Anoka County Corrections' Sentence to Serve program (STS), or the Department of <br />Corrections (DOC) work force that the city already contracts with. As of Council case preparation, these <br />numbers are not known. It was discussed at the Committee meeting, that if these figures looked good, that <br />the consent agenda case would be `pulled' and discussed with Council for direction. <br />If the STS or DOC numbers are not favorable, this case will approve advertisements and direct invitations <br />for proposals to lawn care providers and property maintenance firms for the two RFPs. Proposals would be <br />due to the City on March 17 2010. Staff would then perform an analysis and recommendation for the two <br />potential contracts for approval at the City Council meeting of March 23 2010 <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to proceed with the RF/? for contracted services <br />Reviewed by: <br />City Administr or <br />Director of Pub 'c W s /Pririci <br />CC: 2/23/10 \L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.