My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/17/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/17/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:27:53 PM
Creation date
2/22/2010 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Civil Engineer II Linton reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if this was trying to rectify the problem to May 2009. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton responded that was correct. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Dehen, seconded by Councilmember McGlone, to recommend to the <br />City Council changing the REU for 14000 Sunfish Lake Blvd to 16.062, 6451 McKinley Street <br />to 10.254 and 6250 Sunfish Lake Blvd to 20.927, effective May 2009 and credit these properties <br />for the 2nd Quarter and 3rd Quarter 2009 billing difference. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig and Councilmembers Dehen and McGlone. <br />Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />No Parking Restrictions on Public/Private Streets <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone asked if there was a checklist staff used. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson responded it was always thought that the association agreement <br />would cover this, but the City did not have the opportunity to review the agreements. He noted <br />going forward, the City would review all association agreements. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmer noted in the future escrow could be collected for signage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he was not a big believer in spending a lot of money on signage. <br />He believed things could be accomplished with letters to the associations. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Jankowski stated the City could send out letters to the associations <br />asking for compliance and request the associations respond back and acknowledge the no <br />parking restrictions would be enforced and if the associations did not respond, the City would <br />install signs and charge for the signs and installation. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson noted public streets the City could signage with no problem, but on <br />the private streets he was not sure if the City could enforce signage. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich believed the Fire Code was stronger than an association agreement <br />and if there was a safety issue, the Fire Marshall had broad sweeping powers. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler suggested staff prepare maps to be given to the associations outlining their <br />developments. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked staff to prepare an estimate on how much it would cost to sign public <br />streets. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / November 17, 2009 <br />Page 4 ofS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.