Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 17 - <br /> <br />require 318 acres for ash disposal and 10,000 acres of private <br />farmland for landspreading of sludge. The only other feasible <br />alternative is to incinerate all sludge the entire year. This <br />option then requires 388 acres for ash disposal. All of the <br />acreages contained in this report exclude buffer areas. <br /> <br />Total incineration would require the most land for ash <br />landf1lling, which would be the worst case. No option requires <br />the MWCC to dispose of sludge on their own land. If the MWCC <br />must temporarily shut down all of the incinerators because of air <br />pollution violations it is assumed that enough private farmland <br />would be available for landspreading of sludge. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It is, therefore, recommended that enough land be purchased imme- <br />diately to accommodate incineration of primary sludge for the <br />entire year. An option to purchase adjoining land to dispose of <br />all the sludge by incineration would also be needed. This would <br />mean the purchase of 226 acres and an option to purchase an <br />additional 162 acres. <br /> <br />It is recommended that the MWCC pursue land application of <br />digested sludge from the Anoka, Stillwater, Rosemount, Hastings, <br />Bayport and Cottage Grove treatment plants on private farms. <br />This plan would require no additional land purchase for sludge <br />disposal. If this alternative cannot be implemented at any of <br />these treatment plants, their sludge would be bauled to an <br />interceptor sewer tributary to the Metro Plant. The calculations <br />of the amount of land needed for the various alternatives at the <br />Metro Plant include the sludge produced ~y these plants. <br />Therefore, no additional land would be n.ecessary over and above <br />what is projected for the Metro Plant. . <br /> <br />Seneca <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The MWCC recommends that the plant continue with total sludge <br />incineration. This alternative costs more than the alternative <br />of incinerating sludge for six months and landspreading sludge on <br />private agricultural land for the remaining six months. The MWCC <br />said the incineration system is a proven technology and they <br />would not have to train staff in a new disposal method. <br /> <br />Total incineration would require 51 acres for ash disposal. <br />Combining incineration and landspreading would reqiure 32 acres <br />for an ash landfill and 650 acres of private farmland for land <br />disposal. <br /> <br />Choosing total incineration over incineration and land spreading <br />may be reasonable at this time due to inexperience with <br />landspreading. However, this may not be the case for long. <br />Local farmers are watching commercial fertilizer costs junp and <br />more farmers are requesting information about using sludge. The <br />cost of producing commercial fertilizer, an energy intensive <br />industry, will rise as energy costs rise. Therefore, it seems <br />highly probable that within several years there will be a very <br />large demand for sludge like the sludge from the Seneca plant <br />that does not contain large amounts of heavy metals. Also, the <br />MWCC is gaining experience every day from the land spreading ~f <br />the Metro plant sludge and the Empire sludge. <br />