My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/13/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 01/13/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:36:02 PM
Creation date
3/8/2010 10:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/13/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />underwriters, dealers, dealer banks, and institutional investors. Results show the market <br />may already be imposing penalties in the form of higher interest costs where accounting and <br />financial reporting are substandard. <br /> <br />To assess the size of the penalty, S&P looked to one of its units which regularly prices <br />about $20 billion of tax-exempt bonds for investment trusts. Based on views obtained there, <br />plus contact with underwriters and market makers who set interest costs on new issues, <br />research shows penalties may average 0.125 to 0.25 percentage point. <br /> <br />On a typical $100 miIlionissue of bonds with a 10-year average life, that equals a penalty <br />of $1,250,000 to $2,500,000 over the issue's average life. The market for new general <br />obligation bonds totals about $12 billion annually. Based on estimates that half ofthem don't <br />comply with GAAP, taxpayers could be penalized from $75 million to $150 million over a <br />10-year average life of the bonds. This penalty would be repeated annually as more new <br />bonds are issued in future years. <br /> <br />Of those polled by Goldstein/Krall on generally accepted accounting principles <br />(GAAP) and the municipal bond market: <br /> <br />-Fifty-four percent (54%) said they think the marketplace now imposes interest rate <br />penalties on issuers who don't conform to accounting and reporting standards. <br />Seventy-six percent (76%} of them think the penalties will increase in the future <br /> <br />-Seventy-eight percent (78%) said they think issuers who ignore GAAP will have a <br />harder time selling general obligation bords in the future <br /> <br />-Sixty-five percent (65%) said they think the market feels less comfortable now with <br />general obligation bonds than five years ago <br /> <br />-Ninety-five percent (95%} said in their opinion municipal accounting standards are <br />important. Eighty-nine ,percent (89%) said they feel accounting practices as a bond <br />rating consideration is "desirable." <br /> <br />The research also'found critics among those interviewed. Among sample comments: <br /> <br />-Municipal issuers may not decide' to change accounting procedures for the sole <br />purpose of getting an S&P rating <br /> <br />-The accounting profession is trying to impose corporate standards on governments <br /> <br />-It is not S&P's responsibility to make rules but to analyze what is given to them <br /> <br />-So long as municipalities can get bids on bonds, they won't do more than they have to. <br /> <br />Dollar <br />Volume <br />ID <br />Billions <br /> <br />Municipal Bond New Issue Volume by Type of Security <br />50 <br />45 <br />40 <br />35 <br />30 <br />25 <br />20 <br />IS <br />10 <br />S <br /> <br /> <br />All <br /> <br />'66 '67 '68 '69 '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '17 '78 '79 <br />General obligallon bonds have declined In recent years as a percent of lotallax-exempl <br />Issues. Source: Public Securities Association. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.