My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/13/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
04/13/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 2:36:20 PM
Creation date
4/8/2010 3:08:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Finance Committee
Document Date
04/13/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FC# 4 • oot <br />AMENDMENT TO FINANCIAL POLICY FOR PURPOSE OF ALLOCATION <br />OF EXCESS/DEFICIT GENERAL FUND REVENUES <br />By: Diana Lund, Finance Officer <br />Background: <br />In 1994, Resolution #94-02-045 was created to establish a financial policy for the <br />purpose of the allocation of the excess/deficient General Fund Revenues remaining at <br />year end. This policy was amended by Resolution #04-10-320. <br />The policy takes into consideration that the General Fund fund balance is to be an amount <br />equal to 60% of the next years adopted General Fund Budget. If there are funds <br />remaining, or a deficit exists, the following City Funds would share the allocation. <br />Park Trust Fund - 10% of excess/deficit <br />Equipment Replacement Fund -10% of excess/deficit <br />Public Facilities Construction Fund - 40% of excess/deficit <br />Public Improvement Revolving Fund - 40% of excess/deficit <br />The Office of the State Auditor gives the following statement of position for fund <br />balances for local governments: The State Auditor recommends that at year-end local <br />governments maintain an unreserved fund balance in their general fund and special <br />revenue funds of approximately 35 to 50 percent of fund operating revenues or no less <br />than five months of operating expenditures, which should provide the local government <br />with adequate funds until the next property tax revenue collection cycle. The adequacy <br />of unreserved fund balance should be assessed based on an individual local government's <br />own circumstances. If the local government's unreserved funds balance is less than or <br />greater than the 35 to 50 percent recommended, the local government should be able to <br />explain the reason for the difference. <br />Taking the auditors recommendation into consideration, the city has the ability to amend <br />its current policy by removing the section of the current policy which states that an <br />amount equal to 10% of the next year's operating budget will be allocated to the <br />"unreserved-undesignated" fund balance of the general fund. Amending the policy to <br />50% will place the city in the fund balance range reflected by the State Auditor. <br />A possible use for the 10% currently held in the General Fund Reserves would be to <br />transfer to the debt service account of the municipal center to pay down debt. With the <br />debt service averaging $1.5 million per year, the City has been levying approximately <br />$500,000 and internally loaning $1 million from the utility funds. Another use, with the <br />proposed decrease in market value for 2011, would be to help offset the 2011 General <br />Fund operating expenditures. The 10% transfer will be accounted for in the PIR fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.