Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />March 15,1989 <br />PAGE 3 <br />In response to Weaver's query as to what this board must <br />due to take a responsible step toward compliance with the <br />Water Management Plan addressing this matter, Dixon replied <br />that eventually this board will be reviewing all <br />developments. He cautioned that the LRRWMO does not want to <br />review storm sewers for size, etc. They should look at it in <br />terms of the effects on water quality by sediment or in other <br />matters or potential parking lot materials which will have an <br />effect on water resources. This board should concern them- <br />selves with water quality issues and not land use. <br />While WMO members were aware that the Water Management <br />Plan has not been approved by all reviewing agencies, they <br />concurred that legal adviser Curtis Pearson be asked to <br />advise them on their statutory requirements in order to meet <br />the standards in the plan relative to water quality. <br />Dixon recommended that during this process, city <br />council's must be informed that the present WMO activities <br />will need to change in the future to address water quality <br />issues. <br />Schrantz felt that consulting engineer Dean Skallman <br />should be requested to present a recommendation relating to <br />reasonable standards for parking lots as well as a reasonable <br />policy for plat review, upon review of those established in <br />other watershed districts. Weaver and Raatikka concurred. <br />Dixon recommended that this board not rush into these <br />actions, but rather first get the Water Management Plan <br />reviewed and style the process on what is approved. <br />The board concurred that April's agenda include <br />continued discussion and recommendation from Dean Skallman on <br />parking lot sizes and standards as well as a recommended <br />policy for reviewing plats. Curt Pearson will be asked to <br />attend the April meeting to discuss legal implications and <br />the need to review plats. The board and Mr. Pearson will <br />also discuss the results of the public hearings on the <br />proposed Rum River Minimum Wake Ordinance. <br />MISCELLANEOUS <br />The board noted the receipt of the <br />Watershed map as requested from Barr <br />further map information was required, <br />of the numbers of DNR wetlands and tha <br />Watershed District be outlined with a <br />pen. <br />large Lower Rum River <br />Engineering; however, <br />such as the inclusion <br />the Lower Rum River <br />transparent highlight <br />