Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />June 19, 1991 <br />Page 4 <br />Schrantz queried the status of the phasing out of the Anoka <br />Treatment Plant, referencing a May 10, 1991, letter he <br />received at Andover, not as part of LRRWMO information. <br />Schultz reported the City of Anoka allows the Metropolitan <br />Waste Control Commission to use Anoka land. The city has <br />nothing further to do with the operation. <br />A May 23, 1991, letter from Dick Osgood, Limnologist/Emriron- <br />mental Planner, Metropolitan Council, was noted. Said letter <br />referenced the Metropolitan Council's proposal to begin a <br />citizen - assisted lake monitoring program in 1992. Recording <br />Secretary Mikkonen reported she noted the similarity between <br />this proposed activity and that proposed by the Anoka County <br />Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), with which the <br />LRRWMO is participating at a total cost of $675.00 for moni- <br />toring three lakes, with an additional $35.00 cost per lake <br />approved for Seechi Disc monitoring. Upon receipt of Mr. <br />Osgood's letter, Mikkonen contacted Pat Rudolph, Anoka County <br />SWCD, requesting her observation of the Metropolitan Council <br />proposal. Ms. Rudolph indicated while it seems the <br />Metropolitan Council's monitoring may be more detailed, the <br />Anoka County SWCD program will provide much of the needed <br />information. She reportedly stated while it would be a good <br />program, it will also be costly, at $1,000.00 per lake. It <br />is a judgement call for the LRRWMO members. <br />Mikkonen added Ms. Rudolph informed her of the three lakes <br />being monitored for the LRRWMO by the SWCD, Sunfish Lake will <br />receive extensive monitoring because of the Waste Management <br />Landfill project. She stated it is doubtful Lake Itasca can <br />be monitored by Seechi Disc in that it is severely weed <br />choked and dangerous for anyone to attempt to gain access to <br />the deeper parts of the lake due to the perimeter weeds. <br />Liability insurance for the SWCD will be extremely costly <br />also. Lake Itasca is also very low due to the previous <br />drought years. The remaining lake to be monitored, Rodgers <br />Lake, will most likely be monitored as proposed. Seechi Disc <br />monitoring - activities will be billed at a - later - date'when <br />more information on resident participation is available. <br />Erickson suggested writing the Metropolitan Council informing <br />them of our involvement with the Anoka County SWCD monitor - <br />ing/Seechi Disc program. Weaver requested Pat Rudolph first <br />be asked to provide a written comment by the July meeting on <br />whether her agency can provide the same service as the <br />Metropolitan Council is offering. Erickson advised members <br />these types of situations must be kept in mind when the <br />budget is again up for consideration. Weaver indicated <br />$1,000.00 per lake is excessive. <br />