My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:00 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 9:00:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/19/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ • . 3 <br />LRRWMO Joint Meeting Minutes <br />APRIL 11 <br />Page 2 <br />was increased to $8,500; and next year the LRRWMO will <br />continue to hold it at 58,500, but will have to spend down <br />somewhat on our reserve. Weaver reported the board has <br />operated very frugally. <br />RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE LRRWMO AND ITS <br />MUNICIPALITIES <br />Pearson addressed the responsibilities and duties of the <br />LRRWMO and its member cities, including its relationship to <br />the LRRP7MO Water Management Plan, recently approved January <br />23, 1991. He indicated the problem he foresees is the <br />Federal, State, and local governments will tell the WMO's <br />what must be done; and these mandates will cost money. The <br />State legislature has passed specific responsibilities on to <br />the WMO's, to which they must respond. <br />Pearson discussed a brief history of his involvement in the <br />inception of the Water Management Organization activities <br />back in 1968. He indicated many of the current stricter <br />mandates coming out of the State legislature is due, he <br />feels, to a history of related problems within Anoka County. <br />Pearson also reported recent changes will require the LRRWP1O <br />to revise its Joint Powers Agreement, which is currently not <br />consistent with State law. He informed those present <br />according to current law, all four member communities do not <br />to current law, all four member communities do not have to <br />agree on LRRWMO activities; the majority will dictate the <br />operations. <br />The recently approved LRRP:MO Water Management Plan was <br />discussed. Pearson stated the plan, as adopted, contains <br />everything the State agencies are asking this board and its <br />member cities to do. All four municipalities will have to <br />meet the minimum standards found in this plan. Pearson asked <br />those present to pay specific attention to Appendix B, the, <br />portion of the plan addressing water quality. He indicated <br />higher levels of government do have the authority to penalize <br />the LRRWMO and /or cities if you do not carry out your <br />responsibilities. The planners in each city need to be aware <br />of what is happening. <br />Pearson indicated the law requires the cities to adopt a <br />local plan. He was pleasantly surprised to hear recently <br />that all four member cities of the LRRWMO are either in the <br />process of creating their plans or are very near completion. <br />Pearson advised when the local plans are being prepared, they <br />must be consistent with the LRRWMO Water Management Plan. He <br />indicated the law says if you do not make them consistent, <br />the county will do it for you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.