My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:09 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 10:08:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/17/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />February 12, 1992 <br />Page 6 <br />LRRWMO having its plan in place. In addition, Jankowski <br />indicated he thinks it is reasonable to do this because this <br />particular area is completely covered with rooted vegetation <br />and is not an open water situation. The majority of the <br />wetland,- particularly - this bay, is covered with rooted <br />vegetation. Jankowski indicated he feels it will be a <br />natural place for the sediment to come out in any event. <br />Schrantz queried how Ramsey plans to clean it. Jankowski <br />stated Ramsey could construct a berm across there and clean <br />it in the winter. However, he stated this berm construction <br />would have very little effect. Schrantz concurred, stating <br />the weeds would do it. Jankowski stated if they want Ramsey <br />to clean this, it would be possible to do so without <br />constructing an additional basin in there; that is what you <br />have now. <br />Jankowski confirmed drainage into this property would <br />primarily be from adjacent homes, driveways and the streets. <br />There are two catch basins with approximately fifteen inch <br />pipe by the homes which could have sumps in them. Others <br />would drain directly into the pipe. Jankowski stated, in <br />looking at this, Ramsey could double the length of the pipe <br />between the given location and the pond and back, but <br />questioned whether such action would be worth the additional <br />cost. <br />Jankowski indicated he is requesting LRRWMO approval, <br />contingent upon the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer's approval of <br />the surge basins and the ponding for outfall P1. He stated <br />Ramsey would still need a variance for the concept of direct <br />discharge for a portion of the drainage area at P2. <br />Jankowski stated it would be possible to put catch basins in <br />from the residential lots, but it would involve an extra <br />structure. <br />Schultz acknowledged the concern for the residential use of <br />fertilizers and run off from the roadway. With any high <br />water this would migrate quickly. <br />upon discussion of the Consulting Engineer's review, <br />Jankowski stated he is sure Skallman will not approve this. <br />Erickson suggested perhaps Ramsey put in catch basins with <br />sump catch basins. Jankowski indicated Ramsey could comply <br />with that. With that, Erickson felt perhaps the project <br />would then comply with standards. Jankowski stated the catch <br />basins would not catch everything. However, Jankowski <br />indicated he would be willing to discuss with Skallman <br />Whether sumps would comply with sediment control <br />requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.