Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 1992 <br />Page 6 <br />organized in a manual, with <br />year. The other board members <br />organized and indexed. <br />Erickson suggested, <br />should be added to <br />wetland mitigation <br />board shall review <br />occurs. ". <br />LRRWMO review of them once a <br />concurred that they should be <br />and the board concurred, a sentence <br />the bottom of the first paragraph of the <br />?olicy for Anoka County: "The LRRWMO <br />the mitigation plan when the project <br />Upon further discussion on the definition of the "highest <br />quality level of the wetlands ", Erickson stated the LRRWMO <br />will have to make the determination on the quality of <br />wetlands to be constructed on a case by case basis. The <br />board concurred the policy and letter to Anoka County should <br />include language near the end of the first paragraph <br />indicating, "Said quality level of the newly constructed <br />wetland shall be determined by the LRRWMO." The <br />Administrative Secretary agreed to make the appropriate <br />changes to the policy and letter to Anoka County Commission <br />Chairman Dan Erhart and provide a clean copy for the board's <br />review and Chairman's signature at its next meeting. <br />Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE <br />THE LRRWMO POLICY ADDRESSING WETLAND MITIGATION PROJECTS FOR <br />ANOKA COUNTY AS AMENDED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE <br />THE LETTER DRAFTED TO ANOKA COUNTY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAN <br />ERHART ADDRESSING THE LRRWMO POLICY ON COUNTY WETLAND <br />MITIGATION PROJECTS, AS AMENDED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Schrantz stated, and the board concurred, after an LRRWMO <br />permit has been approved and signed, the Administrative <br />Secretary should see that a copy of same is sent to the <br />applicant for his /her information. <br />Jankowski conversed with Skallman via the telephone about a <br />number of concerns discussed by the board. His response was: <br />Permit #92 -15 - Skallman could not find a where a check was <br />submitted with the LRRWMO application. He was unable to do a <br />thorough review due to a lack of information. Jankowski <br />stated he will see that an application and fee is provided <br />for this project review. Skallman's concerns will be <br />addressed in order to meet LRRWMO requirements. <br />