Laserfiche WebLink
problem. Applicants generally don't apply for a rezoning unless they have a very specific project <br />in mind and are ready to develop once the zoning is in place. As it stands now, there is nothing <br />to prevent the City Council from reverting the .zoning back to what it previously was if a <br />development does not occur as presented at the time of rezoning. However, the draft ordinance <br />would formalize the process and give the developer notice of the City's options if the <br />development does not occur as presented. The draft ordinance states that any rezoning to <br />anything but single family residential will require the applicant to enter into a conditional <br />rezoning agreement (CRA). The CRA would require the applicant to develop the property as <br />presented to the City, would allow the City to revert to the previous zoning district for non- <br />compliance with the preliminary plat or site plan. Further the CRA states that the applicant shall <br />not contest the rezoning of the subject.property back to the original desi~ation. <br /> <br />Councih-nember Elvig inquired if the City is really stuck with a comprehensive plan amendment <br />if the Met Council won? revert the land use back or does the City have__their own limits. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that the. City has to be consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan, and in theory, the City could say that they are not in compliance and pull. funding. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that the 90-day timetable with the Met Council would generally be the <br />prob [em. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated that one of the advantages to conditional rezoning is that they are <br />able to set higher architectural standards to make the rezoned area fit into the community better. <br /> <br />Conncih-nember Zimmerman stated that the City currently has a lot of the pieces in place already, <br />but the ordinance would formalize the whole process by drawing a contract and putting the <br />developer on notice that if they. don't develop what is in the agreement the rezoning could be <br />changed back and the developer will not be able to fight it. <br /> <br />The City Council directed staff to proceed with the conditional rezoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if there was anything the City should be looked at when the Met <br />Council adopts the 2030 plan. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that that would be. a good idea. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that the City of Dayton is going to the Met Council requesting a <br />comprehensive plan amendment to eliminate the river bridge crossing. He noted that he woUld <br />be discussing the issue with the Met Council. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to forward the City's position on the elimination of the river <br />bridge crossing in Dayton to the Met Council. <br /> <br />City Council/March 4, 2003 <br /> Page 15 of 16 <br /> <br />-125- <br /> <br /> <br />