My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/06/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/06/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:03:37 AM
Creation date
4/30/2010 11:53:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/06/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />March 10, 2010 (Volume 4 ~ No. 5 Zoning Bulletin <br />two apartments constiruted a prohibited "boarding house" use or a per- j <br />miffed "two unit residential use."' <br />T'he Background/Facts: Dimiui and Anthony Seretakis owned a large <br />house in the town. The house sat aaoss the sweet from Bowdoin Col- <br />lege. It was located in the Town Residential 2 ("TR2") zone and in the <br />! Village Review Overlay zone. <br />! Beginning in March 2007, the Seretakis leased "Apartment A" in <br />~ the house to six students. They also leased "Apartment B" in the house <br />' to five srudents. Under the leases, "the tenants in each apartment were <br />jointly responsible for a single monthly rent payment and for most utili- <br />ties for that apartment." <br />Michael Adams and three other property owners in the town (colle~- <br />tively, the "Neighbors") contacted the town to express their concern that <br />the Seretakis' house was being used as a boazding house. A boarding <br />' house use was prohibited in the TR2 zone. <br />In May 2007, the towns' Code Enforcement Officer ("CEO") issued <br />his opinion that, in accordance with the town's zoning ordinance (the <br />"Ordinance"), the use of the house qualified as "an allowable `two unit <br />residential use."' It was not a prohibited boarding house. <br />The Neighbors appealed to the town's Zoning,Boazd of Appeals <br />("ZBA"). <br />The ZBA affirmed the CEO's interpretation of the Ordinance. Later, ~ -~ <br />the ZBA denied the Neighbors' request for reconsideration. <br />In August 2007, the Neighbors filed a complaint in Superior Court. <br />They sought to overturn the decisions of the CEO and the ZBA. <br />The Superior Court affirmed, finding the house constiruted "two <br />dwelling units rather than a boarding house." <br />• The Neighbors appealed. <br />The Court's Decision: Judgment of the Superior Court affirmed. <br />The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine held that the students' living ar <br />rangement in the Seretakis' house qualified as a permitted residential use <br />under the Ordinance. <br />In reaching that conclusion, the court construed definitions in the <br />Ordinance. <br />"Dwelling Unit" was defined in the Ordinance as: "A group of rooms <br />providing living quarters containing independent cooking, sleeping, and <br />bathroom facilities for one household." <br />"Household" was defined as: "One person, or a group of two or <br />more persons living together in the same dwelling unit in a single house- <br />keeping entity." <br />"Boarding House" was defined as: "A building other than a hotel <br />containing a shared kitchen and/or dining room, with sleeping rooms <br />accommodating no more than two persons per room (excepting minor (. _ ~ <br />children) which are offered for rent, with or without meals. Includes a <br />college fraternity or soroiity." <br />'. _ 10 ©2010 Thomson Reuters <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.