Laserfiche WebLink
windows that faces a public way or a large <br />rear court. At a density level much closer <br />to single-family homes than to high rises, <br />town houses should provide breathing <br />space more like single-family houses do. <br />Defining the front an d rear facades <br />of a town house as'those walls that are <br />generally perpendicularto party walls"and <br />"typically the primary sources" of light and <br />aicfor the unit, the ordinance set minimum <br />distances between two rows of town house <br />structures and between town houses and <br />lot lines. The standards varied based on <br />the density allowed by different zoning <br />classifications. For example, properties <br />zoned in RM-4 and RM-q.5 classifications <br />required more separation than those prop- <br />erties inhigher (i.e., denser) classifications <br />like RM-5 and RM-5.5. The actual numbers <br />were based on field observation. We clas- <br />sified andmeasured existing cases,even- <br />tually settling on themedian distance we <br />found in theprojects we labeled "good" (as <br />opposed to "bad" or "really good"). <br />NoMore.BlankFacades <br />Priorto the ordinance, developers and <br />architects came up with some creative <br />reasons whythey chose to design street <br />facades with few or no windows or doors. <br />Some cited the noise ofa busy streeGas <br />j ustification, or the fear of crime. Others <br />simply didn't provide windows on the end <br />wall of a row of units foci ng the street be- <br />causethat would involve a slightvariation <br />in the fiooYplan ofthe end unit. Whatever <br />the reason, these decisions were devastat- <br />ing tothe blocks where these develop- <br />ments occurred. <br />The ordinance dealtwith this problem <br />as follows: "to avoid the appearance of <br />blank walls, building facades that face pub- <br />licstreets must include elements ofa front <br />facade, including doors and/or windows." <br />This was one ofthe weaker provisions of <br />the ordinance. While it expressed the intent <br />of avoiding blankwalls, it proved to be too <br />open-ended. Was one small window per <br />unit enough to cover th a requirement? <br />Planners returned to this issue inzooq <br />as part ofthemuch-needed updating of <br />Chicago's enti[e zoning code. New provi- <br />sions relatingto all residential districts now <br />required "eyes on the street" to be attained <br />by providing pedestrian entrance doors or <br />transparent wi ndows covering at least t7.5 <br />percent of the area of each buildi ng facade <br />facing a street. This percentage represents.. <br />about halfofthe window or door area that <br />habitable rooms would normally generate <br />on a facade. So while this new requirement <br />was an improvement in terms of making <br />neighborhoods safer (allowing residents <br />to see what takes place on the street), it <br />doesn't guarantee that new town house fa- <br />cades will have the amount dF fenestration <br />typical of most residential buildings. <br />Private Yards and Common Open Spaces <br />The town house ordinance was developed <br />at the sametimethat the Department of <br />Planning and Developmentwas studying . <br />how to accommodate new park space to <br />go along with all the new housing being <br />constructed. On a of the resultsbf this as- <br />sessmentwas an Open Space Impact Fee <br />fqr all new residential development. The <br />other was a requirement for private yards <br />and common open space in town house <br />developments, where some ofthe most <br />densely packed new construction was <br />occurring. (Open space requirements for <br />other residential types were added in the <br />zooy zoning code overhaul.) <br />The town house ordinance regdires <br />zoo square feet of private yard space per <br />unit in all but the dehsest districts, where <br />the number is reduced to t75 square feet. <br />We arrived at the figure ofzoo square feet <br />through a combination of factors. Most <br />units we were seeing ranged from i6 to <br />zo feet wide. With the frontyard setback <br />of tz feet required by the ordinance, the <br />yard that could readily be associated with <br />one unit would thus range from i9z to zqo <br />square feet in area. This coincided with the <br />yard sizes in existing [own house develop- <br />ments wehad measured and categorized <br />as "good;' The town house ordinance re- <br />quiredthese yards to be directly accessible <br />firom the unit. <br />Some young professionals who pur- <br />chase orrent town houses might prefer <br />not to have the responsibility of caring for <br />yards, cutting grass, or planting orseeding <br />a yard. However, housing lasts for a tong <br />time, and owners age and mature. The cur- <br />rentowner might not be a gardener, but <br />the next owner maybe. We reasoned that <br />a town house is like asingle-family house <br />and should provide some ofthe experience <br />of one. <br />The common open space requirement <br />kicked in with developments ofgo or more <br />units, which were required to provide t5o <br />square feet per unit. No one qualifying area <br />One of the most difficult things <br />to imagine when reading plans is <br />what an outdoor space is going to <br />look like. This is partly because the <br />details will have a lot to do with . <br />the outcome, and they may not be <br />available at the time of plan review. <br />These details include colors, type <br />and layout of planting, lighting, <br />furniture, paving materials, etc. <br />Beyond this, being able to visualize <br />three dimensions from atwo-dimen- <br />sionalplan is not a common skill. <br />A goodway to get a handle on <br />this is to studythe plans and eleva- <br />tions of a project that has already <br />been com pleted and try to visualize <br />whattheopen space will lookand <br />feel like. Then go out and check <br />your imagination againstthe real <br />thing. Pay particular attention to the <br />heights and shapes ofthe buildings <br />that enclose the space. Study the <br />effect of landscaping. Take note of <br />details that impress you. Take pic- <br />tures! Back in the office, compare <br />your photos with the plans.lfyou . <br />do this often, it should become <br />easier to read plans with greater <br />comprehension. <br />The best examples of common <br />open space follow the classical ap- <br />proach to city building: The outdoor <br />space is considered as a room, a <br />void carved out from the mass of <br />the buildings, orapredetermined <br />shape around which buildings are <br />arranged. Its shape is well defined, <br />and its size is big enough forthe <br />use to wh ich it is put, not just what <br />is left overafterthebuildingsare <br />plunked down. The space is an ac- <br />tiveenvironmentthatshapesthe <br />buildings and is shaped bythem. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE aao <br />AMERICAN PIANNING 0.5aeCIAnoN Pe9P5 C C <br />