My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/06/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/06/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:03:37 AM
Creation date
4/30/2010 11:53:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/06/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
healthcare to be delivered. He stated there was also competition from other pharmacies in the <br />neighborhood. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Ramsey,. Councilmembers Look, Elvig, Dehen, Jeffrey, <br />McGlone, and Wise. Voting No: None. <br />7.02: Consider Options for Land Use Designation of 18055 Roanoke Street NW Related to <br />the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update; Case of City of Ramsey <br />Associate Planner Gladhill reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked what was the City trying to do here. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill responded the City needed to be consistent with the Metropolitan <br />Council framework for the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Councilmember Look stated the City was not doing this, but the Metropolitan Council was <br />telling the City what to do and he had an issue with that. He noted the property owner had not <br />made the request and she was in fact opposing it. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated at the point in time that the landowner wants to sell, maybe the <br />County could have the first right of refusal. He stated he was disappointed in Met Council's <br />direction. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if this was designated park, it would not be for sale other than to the <br />County. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill noted the potential park would not show up on the official zoning <br />map, but only on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Karen, Anoka County Parks, noted there had been no negotiations for this park and right now the <br />County did not have the funding. She stated the County would only buy properly from willing <br />sellers. She noted the County intended to work with the property owner if/when she wanted to <br />sell the property to the County. If the property owner did not want to sell the property to the <br />County, the County would wait to tallc to the next buyer of the property. <br />Councilmember Wise believed this would have an adverse mark on the property. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated the property owner could sell the property to a private owner or <br />to an investor if she wanted to. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would oppose this as he believed the property would have a diminished <br />value. <br />Councilmember Look believed a piece of properly surrounded by parkland would make that <br />property very valuable. <br />City Council / Apri113, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />P26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.