My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/06/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
05/06/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 4:22:23 PM
Creation date
4/30/2010 11:58:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
05/06/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9. That the Applicant has stated the reasoning for requesting an accessory structure closer to the <br />front property Brie than the principal structure, herein incorporated as reference. <br />10. That the Applicant combined two parcels into one at the County level, and then in 2005 <br />.received a vaziance from the City of Ramsey to split the property back into two adjoining <br />parcels. However, the Applicant did not act upon this variance and this remains one <br />property. <br />11. That splitting of the lot is not permitted without removing the new accessory structure or <br />without construction of a principal structure on the resulting new lot. <br />12. That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally <br />apply to other properties in the district; namely, the Subject Property is in the Critical River <br />Overlay District. <br />13. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br />14. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have <br />additional gazage space on the premises. <br />15. That the Subject Property can/cannot be put to a reasonable use without the vaziance. <br />16. That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property and is/is not <br />created by the applicant. <br />17.: That the Variance willlwill not alter locality's essential character <br />18. That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the undue hardship. <br />19. That the variance requested is/is not the minimum variance which would alleviate the <br />hardship. <br />20. That if granted, the variance wilUwill not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property. <br />21. That if granted, the variance willlwill not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public <br />street. <br />22. That if granted, the variance wilUwill not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public <br />safety. <br />23. That if granted, the variance wilUwill not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br />neighborhood. <br />24. That if granted, the variance wilUwill not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />RESOLUTION #10-OS-_ <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.