My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Airport Improvement Program March 11, 1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Miscellaneous
>
Airport Improvement Program March 11, 1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2024 3:31:34 PM
Creation date
5/11/2010 11:58:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />The land use guidance chart presented in Table 2-2 relates LUG <br />Zones to various aircraft noise estimating methodologies, HUD <br />noise assessment guidelines, and suggested noise controls. LUG <br />Zones A, B, C, and D, as shown, present four levels of airport <br />noise impacts ranging from nominal for LUG A to severe for LUG D. <br />The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Noise <br />Assessment Guidelines are acceptability guidelines for site <br />exposure to noise and are used for screening mortgaging <br />guarantees and other HUD assistance. They are included for <br />information and comparative purposes. The suggested noise <br />controls are a generalized description of the land use control <br />actions typically expected. <br />Four scenarios were analyzed for noise impacts at Gateway North. <br />The scenarios are based on airport activity forecasts developed <br />in the Master Plan Study (1985). Aircraft operations have been <br />selected for 1987 (base year), 1992 (5 year), 1997, (10 year) and <br />2005 (18 year). Although operations have been selected for <br />these years, the actual noise impacts should be considered event <br />oriented rather than time oriented (e.g., the noise map for 1982 <br />depicts noise impacts associated with 22,000 operations regard- <br />less of whether this occurs in 1989, 1992 or 1995). Table 2-3 <br />outlines the major characteristics and assumptions for each <br />scenario. <br />Figures 2-1 through 2-4 illustrate the noise contours associated <br />with each of the activity levels. The base year scenario (1987) <br />uses the existing condition of the facilities with two landing <br />strips, 16-34 and 9-27. The low utilization of Runway 9-27 <br />combined with the low number of annual operations, however, are <br />too low to develop even a minimal noise footprint. Future <br />scenarios assume that the planned improvements have been <br />implemented. They include a 16-34 paved 3300' runway and the <br />closure of Runway 9-27. <br />Note that in all scenarios, noise impacts are expected to be <br />well within acceptable levels (refer to Table 2-2). Even under <br />the 2005 year scenario, all noise levels above 60 Ldn would be <br />contained within the boundaries of airport property and nearly <br />all land exposed to 55 Ldn or greater will be contained on <br />airport property. <br />The Metropolitan Council's Noise Exposure Zones for Minor <br />Airports are also based on Ldn values. Their classification <br />system is as follows: <br />Zone <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />70 Ldn & higher <br />65-70 Ldn <br />60-65 Ldn <br />55-60 Ldn <br />Serious noise/exposure <br />Nuisance <br />Annoying <br />Minimal <br />2-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.