My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
FAA Regulations
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Miscellaneous
>
FAA Regulations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2024 3:58:21 PM
Creation date
5/12/2010 11:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
572
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
eral Aviation Regulation Part 77, Objects Affecting <br />Navigable Airspace, should be studied in the evalua- <br />tion of alternate site locations. <br />c. Environmental factors in the vicinity of pro- <br />posed sites, including existing and proposed land uses, <br />population densities, zoning, and conservation and <br />recreation developments. <br />d. Convenience of sites including study of pas- <br />senger and employee Origination and Destination <br />(O&D) surveys, computation of present and future <br />average travel times and costs, and the effect popula- <br />tion income groups will have on O&D surveys. <br />e. Ground access modes to proposed sites includ- <br />ing existing and proposed highway and rapid transit <br />systems to population centers and possible V/STOL <br />links to nearby airports. Passenger and employee <br />O&D surveys should provide a basis for analyzing <br />access facilities. <br />f. Physical characteristics of alternative sites. <br />The effect on site development costs of topography, <br />soil conditions, drainage, natural resources, and <br />climatic conditions should be analyzed. <br />30 <br />g. Utility services to alternative sites. The avail- <br />ability of major utilities such as electric, gas, water, <br />and telephone should be compared as should the <br />ability of each proposed site to accommodate utilities. <br />The lead times required to extend utility plants in <br />order to serve alternative sites should be considered. <br />h. Land costs of alternate sites. This study <br />should include the history of land values at proposed <br />locations, current and forecast land values, and the <br />impacts on costs of zoning for improved and unim- <br />proved parcels. <br />i. Cost comparisons of alternate sites. A quan- <br />titative and qualitative comparison of the above factors <br />should be made from the standpoint of cost. Quan- <br />titative analysis should evaluate the costs of land <br />acquisition and easements, site developments, major <br />utilities, foundations, access facilities, ground travel <br />to users, and effects on surrounding areas such as <br />noise, air and water pollution, and safety. Qualitative <br />evaluation should consider accessibility to users, com- <br />patible land uses, expansion capabilities, and air traffic <br />control compatibility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.