Laserfiche WebLink
e. Mobile Lounge Terminals. The mobile <br />lounge or passenger transporter concept is in use at <br />Dulles International Airport. It is sometimes called <br />the remote aircraft parking concept. Aircaft parking <br />aprons are remote from the terminal building. The <br />mobile lounges transport passengers from the building <br />to aircraft and can be used as hold rooms at terminal <br />building gate positions. In this concept, the aircraft <br />gate positions are placed in parallel rows at required <br />spacings with mobile lounge and service vehicle roads <br />running between the parallel rows of aircraft. Several <br />sets of parallel aircraft parking rows can be provided <br />for ultimate development of gate positions. Airline <br />operations buildings must be provided adjacent to <br />aircraft parking aprons. <br />With the mobile lounge concept, walking distances <br />are held to a minimum since the compact terminal <br />building contains common passenger processing fa- <br />cilities and curb frontage can be located directly across <br />the terminal building from mobile lounge gates. <br />Building and curb Iength, which is established in <br />part by the number of mobile lounge gates, must be <br />carefully planned to provide adequate frontage for <br />enplaning and deplaning passengers. <br />The concept has good expansion capability in that <br />capacity can be increased by the addition of mobile <br />lounges and the main terminal and aprons can be <br />expanded without the addition of extensive concourses, <br />fingers, or satellites. With the mobile lounge concept, <br />additions can be made with little impedance to airport <br />operations and aircraft movements. <br />Aircraft maneuvering capability is excellent with <br />this concept. Remote aircraft parking can reduce taxi <br />time and distance to runways and avoid aircraft con- <br />gestion next to terminal building facilities. This also <br />removes the aircraft noise and jet blast problem from <br />the building area. Mobile lounges must be capable <br />of mating with various aircraft sill heights and ter- <br />minal building floor heights. <br />In comparing the mobile lounge concept with <br />other concepts, the cost of independent terminal and <br />service buildings and the purchase, operation, and <br />maintenance of mobile lounges must be considered. <br />The time required to move passengers between ter- <br />minal and aircraft by mobile lounge should also be <br />taken into account. <br />f. Unit Terminals. With the unit terminal <br />concept described herein, the airlines build individual <br />terminals around a system of interconnecting access <br />and service roads. The terminals are spaced some <br />distance apart and each terminal provides complete <br />passenger processing and aircraft parking facilities. <br />Airlines which provide limited service to an airport <br />will sometimes combine their operations in a single <br />unit terminal. The concept permits each airline to <br />build a terminal to its own liking and provides for <br />maximum airline identification. Kennedy Interna- <br />tional Airport is the best known example of the unit <br />terminal concept. <br />Walking is held to comfortable distances since <br />unit terminals are much smaller than large joint -use <br />terminals. For this same reason, adequate curb <br />frontage can be easily designed into the unit terminal. <br />Expansion capability with the unit terminal con- <br />cept can be difficult because of the gross area required <br />for each individual terminal. Unit terminals probably <br />require the greatest acreage for development and ex- <br />pansion of any of the terminal area concepts. Con- <br />struction costs are high because passenger processing <br />facilities, aircraft parking aprons, and public parking <br />must be repeated with each unit terminal. <br />Aircraft maneuvering capability within the vi- <br />cinity of unit terminals is usually good since the air- <br />lines have the opportunity to design aircraft aprons <br />and passenger loading devices to suit their own oper- <br />ating requirements. However, the concept requires <br />extensive taxiway systems which lead to complex taxi <br />operations. With the unit terminal concept the rela- <br />tionship between adjacent terminals must be carefully <br />planned if interference between aircraft flows is to be <br />avoided and the capability of expanding individual <br />terminals is to be preserved. <br />55 <br />