Laserfiche WebLink
2/7/85 <br />AC 150/5100-14A <br />(14) Prepare a report recommending that negotiations be initiated with <br />the consultant ranked number one. The report should contain sufficient detail to <br />indicate the extent of the review and the considerations used for the <br />recommendations. <br />(15) The report should be forwarded to the sponsor's administrator or <br />governing body authorized to review the recommendations of the selection board. <br />The recommendations of the selection board should normally be accepted unless the <br />report does not adequately support the recommendations. This will help to ensure <br />complete fairness and open competition. If the recommendations are not accepted, <br />the selection board should be reconvened until acceptable recommendations have been <br />agreed on. —" <br />._ <br />b. Competitiveeg tation. (Price Is a Selection Factor). The selection <br />procedure recommended in paragraphs 9a(1) to 9a(13) should be followed, except: (1) <br />a briefing should be held with all firms on the preselection list prior to <br />submittal of the project proposal to discuss the scope of work; and (2) a cost <br />proposal, in a sealed envelope, should be submitted with the project proposal (see <br />paragraph 12a(1) for the elements of a cost proposal). After receipt of the <br />project and cost proposals, the following procedures are recommended: <br />(1) Prepare a report that rates the project proposals for their <br />technical merit. The report should contain sufficient detail to indicate the <br />extent of the review and the considerations used for the recommendation. The cost <br />proposal should be kept sealed and not evaluated at this time. <br />(2) The report and the sealed cost proposals should be forwarded to the <br />sponsor's administrator or governing body authorized to review the recommendation <br />of the selection board. <br />10. ALTERNATE SELECTION PROCEDURES. The selection procedures recommended in <br />paragraph 9 should normally be followed in the procurement of consulting services. <br />However, for some projects, circumstances may dictate that the recommended <br />procedures are too time consuming or complex for the particular procurement. In <br />these cases, OMB's Attachment "0" provides other acceptable procurement methods <br />which may be used such as small purchase procedures or noncompetitive negotiation. <br />Sponsors should consult with FAA Airports personnel before using these alternatives <br />to assure that the circumstances justify their use. <br />Amr COST -ANALYSIS. <br />a. In order to properly evaluate the consultant's cost proposal, a sponsor <br />having _ t,�-r erienee -in =estiilriati thertust of processional- services and <br />negoti -`L'� or these service`s cie.YgIQpT-airTn'peniient estimate'of'rt'r <br />the -cost Of the services based on a detailed analysis of the scope and conditions <br />oi"E`It't.ork. MSnvora-hdv3•ngrno-sta#'f-or-having little- or no previous experience• <br />in estimatineA'r"8'osty'ditprofessional-services and nego-iiating=contractsfor - <br />consultant services may not be able to prepare such a detailed analysis by <br />themselves. In these instances, the sponsor tvuunau-s_ee:r-tne <br />advice-Of <br />advice-of state <br />avaompersonnedor-FA7A3rportspets6nneIon a exead;scope_of the <br />=YOFfa1ge-If-t6e'sponsor hasrieriginevimretainer who is not being <br />considered for the -project, the sponsor may engage the engineer to prepare a <br />detailed analysis. <br />Chap 2 <br />Par 9 11 <br />