Laserfiche WebLink
AC 150/5300-4B 5 6/24/7 <br />v <br />assign responsibility for policy and administrative direction to a <br />designated official of the public agency. Routine day-to-day <br />supervision of airport operations may be delegated to one of the <br />tenanted proprietary activities doing business at the airport. How- <br />ever, exercise extreme care to distinguish between the functions <br />performed by the tenant in his capacity as an agent of the airport <br />owner and those in the conduct of his own business. Failure to <br />make this distinction is the cause of many problems in the adminis- <br />tration of smaller airports. In considering any such arrangements, <br />make the responsibility for day-to-day maintenance and the enforce- <br />ment of local airport regulations the subject of a separate contract <br />for a separate monetary consideration and completely divorce it <br />from any lease or rental arrangement by which the tenant obtains <br />the use of airport premises and operating privileges for his <br />business. <br />e. In some instances, a community may find itself handicapped by limi- <br />tations in its municipal charter insofar as efficient business man- <br />agement of a public airport is concerned. For example, the charter <br />may require placing all revenues and expenditures into the general <br />funds making it impossible to clearly identify the cumulative <br />record of airport transactions; or the charter may not permit or <br />recognize such items as depreciation or accrued charges, etc.; or <br />the organizational structure of the community may impose salary <br />limitations on the hiring of a competent professional airport <br />manager. For these and other reasons, many communities have found <br />it advantageous to establish an autonomous airport "Authority" <br />fully empowered to administer the airport with a separate fund, to <br />hire its own employees, and to contract with business enterprises <br />to provide the needed proprietary services. <br />69. WILL THE AIRPORT SHOW A PROFIT? <br />a. There is no reason why a publicly owned utility airport cannot <br />ultimately be self-supporting. Like any other enterprise, a new <br />airport may take several years to develop the level of activity <br />necessary to meet expenses. As pointed out in Chapter 1, however, <br />the direct dollar return is not a true measure of the value of the <br />airport to the community. <br />b. A public agency operating a public airport is entitled to seek some <br />recovery of expense incurred in providing the basic public facili- <br />ties such as the landing area, taxiways, parking areas, terminal <br />building, etc. At larger airports it is fairly common practice <br />to impose a direct "toll" or landing fee for use of the landing <br />area, particularly by scheduled air carriers. At most utility <br />airports, however, the administration and collection of such a <br />direct user charge is not practical. Recovery of some part of the <br />Page 80 <br />Chap 13 <br />Par 68 <br />• <br />