My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Airport Zoning
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Miscellaneous
>
Airport Zoning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2024 3:41:14 PM
Creation date
5/13/2010 11:45:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RAMSEY AIRPORT ZONING <br />RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS DURING THE COMMENT <br />PERIOD AT THE JULY 29TH, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING <br />Mr. Ed Babcock <br />C. Mr. Schwartzman's property south of Highway 10 has been held many <br />years for development purposes. Implementation of airport zoning <br />and airport development would impact his client's property <br />through eminent domain proceedings and Zone B restrictions. <br />R. The zoning plan includes a portion of Mr. Schwartzman's (Faye <br />Construction) property in Zone A. The portion in Zone A has been <br />recommended for acquisition. Mr. Babcock, as an attorney, should <br />be well aware that acquisition of land by eminent domain is a <br />last resort. The land acquisition policies and procedures which <br />are required of the City are outlined in the "Uniform Property <br />Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970" <br />(Public Law 91-646). The act outlines acquisition procedures <br />which provide for equitable compensation to property owners <br />preferably through negotiated settlement rather than <br />condemnation. With regard to the potential impact on the <br />property lying within Zone B, no development plan has been <br />submitted to the City for consideration. It is thus difficult to <br />determine whether, in fact, significant negative impacts are <br />created. <br />Ms. Mary Jo Sentryz <br />Q. What will happen to her business in Zone B? <br />R. The existing use as a day care center will be allowed to <br />continue. No new expansion of the day care center or structure <br />would be permitted under the zoning ordinance. The day care <br />business can be sold as it exists today or the building can be <br />sold for another type of commercial use. Only those types of new <br />uses which are specifically prohibited under the Zone B restric- <br />tions would be prohibited under airport zoning. <br />Q. When does the restriction of 15 people per building apply? <br />A. The Ordinance recognizes that since the area was platted in 1976 <br />and improvements were made (streets and curb and gutter), a <br />commercial use was established. For those properties which were <br />platted in 1976 the 15 people per acre (not building) restric- <br />tions do not apply. It does apply, however, to that area within <br />the B Zone which has not been platted and where a definite use <br />has not been established prior to adoption of the Ordinance. <br />Q. What about her home? "It is not in Zone B but apparently is not <br />in Zone C." <br />A. The Sentyrz home does lie in Zone C since all areas within the <br />horizontal zone but not within Zones A or B are within Zone C. <br />Zone C restrictions would apply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.