Laserfiche WebLink
' As shown, by 1995, approximately 35 based aircraft are <br />forecast increasing to approximately 50 to 60 within the 20 <br />year planning period. <br />Each of the forecasts assumes that once improved, the growth <br />of based aircraft will parallel the growth of aviation <br />within the region. The forecasts may be extremely conserva- <br />tive since a likely siphoning off of based aircraft at both <br />Anoka County and Crystal airports may occur dependent on <br />hangar availability and rates. An additional factor which <br />' would significantly increase the number of forecast based <br />aircraft would be either the closure or imposition of opera- <br />tional restrictions at other metro region airports. <br />' As shown on Figure 3 -1 of Section 3, a search area for a new <br />minor airport facility has been identified in the MC's <br />Regional Airports System Plan. The proposed search area for <br />' this facility is located in northwest Hennepin County. <br />Primary functions of this facility would be to provide for <br />future general aviation demand within the Urban Service <br />' Areas of Hennepin and Carver Counties. It also would pro- <br />vide future relief to Crystal and Flying Cloud Airports. <br />Development of a new facility, however, would most likely <br />not occur until at least the mid- 1990's. <br />The impact of this proposed facility on the forecast demand <br />at Gateway is likely to be minor since Gateway serves a <br />' different service area and the likely development schedule <br />of Gateway would proceed at a faster pace. <br />1 <br />5 -4 <br />Due to the planning, funding and acquisition process for <br />federally (Airport Improvement Program) funded airports, <br />' <br />1989 appears to be a realistic construction period for <br />improvements. As shown in Table 5 -2, no aircraft are <br />assumed to be based during most of this construction year. <br />' <br />Once the initial facility improvements are completed, an <br />immediate influx of based aircraft can be expected. The <br />forecast assumes that within two years of facility improve- <br />ments the number of based aircraft will be slightly more <br />, <br />than the four year historic high average of 27 based <br />aircraft. <br />' <br />From that point, 1991, three growth rates are applied based <br />on MC's forecasts of regional aviation demand. The low <br />forecast assumes a 3.38 annual growth rate. The high growth <br />forecast assumes a 58 annual growth rate, and a mid -range <br />forecast assumes a growth rate of 48 annually. <br />' As shown, by 1995, approximately 35 based aircraft are <br />forecast increasing to approximately 50 to 60 within the 20 <br />year planning period. <br />Each of the forecasts assumes that once improved, the growth <br />of based aircraft will parallel the growth of aviation <br />within the region. The forecasts may be extremely conserva- <br />tive since a likely siphoning off of based aircraft at both <br />Anoka County and Crystal airports may occur dependent on <br />hangar availability and rates. An additional factor which <br />' would significantly increase the number of forecast based <br />aircraft would be either the closure or imposition of opera- <br />tional restrictions at other metro region airports. <br />' As shown on Figure 3 -1 of Section 3, a search area for a new <br />minor airport facility has been identified in the MC's <br />Regional Airports System Plan. The proposed search area for <br />' this facility is located in northwest Hennepin County. <br />Primary functions of this facility would be to provide for <br />future general aviation demand within the Urban Service <br />' Areas of Hennepin and Carver Counties. It also would pro- <br />vide future relief to Crystal and Flying Cloud Airports. <br />Development of a new facility, however, would most likely <br />not occur until at least the mid- 1990's. <br />The impact of this proposed facility on the forecast demand <br />at Gateway is likely to be minor since Gateway serves a <br />' different service area and the likely development schedule <br />of Gateway would proceed at a faster pace. <br />1 <br />5 -4 <br />