Laserfiche WebLink
-236- <br /> <br />existing Alicia Addition, an existing 14 rural lot residential development. This access will need <br />to provide for a temporary cul-de-sac until such time as the property owner to the north decides <br />to develop his 20-acre parcel and extend Rabbit Street to the north. A third access is being <br />shown in the southeastern corner of the project area for the purposes of connecting the <br />southeastern portion of Rabbit Street to the existing Nutria Street located in Autumn Meadows, <br />the residential development located immediately to the east of the subject project area. The <br />connection of Rabbit Street to Nutria Street through Autumn Meadows subdivision will require <br />acquisition of approximately 6,150 square feet (0.14acres) from Lot 1, Block 1 Autumn <br />Meadows. Staff feels connecting Rabbit Street to Nutria Street will provide' for an immediate <br />second access to the proposed Tiger Meadows development and provide for a needed second <br />access to the 27-single family lots located east of the subject property that are now currently <br />dependent upon 167th Lane as their sole access. <br /> <br />Staff contacted the property owner of Lot 1, Block 1 Autumn Meadows regarding the <br />recommendation to acquire a portion of his property for public right-of-way purposes. The <br />property owner of Lot I, Block I Autumn Meadows has responded to staffs acquisition <br />recommendation through a letter attached to this case. The property owner, Mark Anderson, has <br />suggested that the southeastern portion of Rabbit Street in Tiger Meadows be a cul-de-sac. <br />Starting from the Cul-de-sac the City should construct a pedestrian pathway, wide enough to <br />accommodate emergency vehicles, through the parkland connecting to Nutria. It is Mr. <br />Anderson's opinion that constructing an emergency access by means of a pedestrian pathway will <br />achieve the City's desired second access for emergency purposes to Tiger Meadows and the <br />existing 27 single family homes. Mr. Anderson also states that his proposal will eliminate <br />unwanted traffic immediately adjacent to his property and will provide the existing residential <br />area a nice bike and walking path to the existing park. <br /> <br />Staff responded to Mr. Anderson's letter with the following recommendation: The City would <br />obtain the necessary right-of-way to accommodate a public street from the east plat boundary of <br />Tiger Meadows, through Lot 1, Block 1 of Autumn Meadows and connecting to Nutria Street. <br />The City would construct a 10 foot wide trail within that 60 foot right-of-way. This paved trail <br />would serve as an emergency access until Mr. Anderson sells the property. At that time, the City <br />would convert the trail to a full service public road. In the interim, the trail would be signed as a <br />future through street. Mr. Anderson is not in favor of the City acquiring any portion of his <br />property for purposes of a full service street or a pedestrian pathway. <br /> <br />At the request of City staff and the developer, the City Council reviewed staffs recommendation <br />for the acquisition of 0.14 acres of Lot 1, Block 1, Autumn Meadows for public fight-of-way <br />purposes, at the Tuesday, April 1, 2003 Council work session. The discussion primarily focused <br />on whether or not the proposed development would be better developed as a cluster development <br />in anticipation of City services being extended to the area in the future. The Council discussed <br />how the internal street design and street connection issue would be impacted if the subject <br />property were developed to cluster standards. The City Council directed staff to begin working <br />on language to provide for cluster development provisions in the Comprehensive Plan and City <br />Code. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Tiger Meadows sketch plan at their Thursday, <br />April 3, 2003 meeting. A public hearing is not required during sketch plan, however the Planning <br />Commission allowed public comments. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />