Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> October 2009 Draft October 2009 Draft 5.25.10 <br /> Second Generation Plan Third Generation Plan City Storm Water Plan City Comments Comment <br />Policy No Goals & Policies Topic <br /> Water Quantity , ! <br /> I <br /> Emergency overflows or outlets <br /> Min. bldg elevations should be provided to any landlocked area <br />1.9 designed above designated flood if available stormwater storage 1.13 of SWMP reiterates this <br /> levels capacity is inadequate to <br /> prevent flooding of residences <br /> Each city will perform maint. <br />1.10 Same as 1.9 of 3rd Gen Plan measures to assure proper 1.15 of SWMP reiterates this <br /> funciton of drainage system <br /> The WMO will have standard WMO will work with cities and SWMP does encourage low No additional review <br />1.11 hydrologic design criteria for developers to promote low Impact Development needed <br /> consistency purposes Impact Development <br /> The process for <br /> developing a non <br /> Requirements of the non- Ramsey should have input into degradation plan <br />1.12 Same as 1.10 of 3rd Gen Plan degradation plan are the the non-degradation plan and require the <br /> responsibility of the community to <br /> municipalities be a participant in its drafting debvelope and <br /> submit the plan to <br /> MPCA for approval <br />Policy No Water Quality <br /> Stormwater generated by <br /> Ranking system established by the urbanization will be treated to <br />2.1 WMO shall dictate intended use and provide a min. 90% annual 2.11 of SWMP reiterates this <br /> water quality standards removal efficiency for TSS and <br /> 60% annual removal eff. for <br /> phosphorous <br /> Future outlets to DNR protected <br />2.2 waters must pass through sed No change from current plan 2.2 of SWMP reiterates this <br /> pond/trap prior to discharge <br />