Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/01/2010

Home

--- ----+---s.ZS.lO Co-';'ents Would require additional NOfo"liowu-p.or- review needed October ZOO9 Draft Plan Comments ---_._--~----_..- Cities have the opportunity to act as the LGU for WCA implementation. training for Staff. Impact Statement/R~uireme~~~~ WCA implementation for Ramsey IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Topic _ None} have existing EC ordinance & reference MPCA _.~_~~elines ________ to be LGU fa -~ Wetlands WMO will continue Recommend striking this from the WMO 3rd Generation Plan Potentially requires the city to get approval of any land use designation change from other municipalities Erosion & Must adopt an existing set of erosion & sediment control guidelines Sedimentation or establish comparable guidelines of its own Any change in land use from the zoning at the time of adoption of this plan that covers 1 acre or more must be approved by all municipalities in the subwatershed language was removed from current draft Land Use ---~- Stormwater & Drainage Design Perfrpmance Standards This concern IS addressed in current draft on p~3!3 Work with ACD & WMO's to reduce nutrient loading -target start is 2016 in SWMP. City should prioritize addressing impaired waters & participate in TMDl sturdies/projects This concern IS addressed In current draft on p. 43 #Z Work with MPCA & WMO to reduce nutrient loading -target start is Z008 in SWMP. City should prioritize addressing impaired waters & participate in TMDl sturdies/projects Mississippi River classified as impaired by MPCA (Fecal coliform) City covered with existing SWMP & comrehensive modeling within. City covered with existing SWMP & comrehensive Rogers lake classified a impaired by MPCA (nutrien & correspondingn in-lake nutrient concentrations pollutant loadings ----.._~----_..~--~---_._- establish a targe Pollutan_t Loadings___~__ establish max. permissible runoff rates for select design storms based upon flood levels and expected increases in volume relative to downstream areas Runoff Rates a major divide between communities. there are few potential intercommunity issues. Beca use the Ru m Rive modeling within. May need to work with WMO if intercommunity issue establish standards to reduce impacts of flooding No follow up or review needed Flooding ~--- Why wouldn't the vegatation used for mitigation purposes be considered and approved as part of the TEP review, with city inpu be restored using with surrounding vegatation. For safety purposes and for suitable habitat for rooted aquatic plants. the bench width should be atleastlS' All disturbed or constructed wetland areas wi City-approved mitigated vegatation consisten Pond Construction No follow up or review needed Current policy requires a 10' bench. No follow up or review needed This concern IS addressed in current draft on p. 43 #2 Skimming devices on outlets to public waters are currently required Ramsey should be involved in the development of a management plan for nutrient reduction in Rogers Lake, along with ACD & URRWMO None Development of target loads establish design criteria for outlet structures to address floatable pollutants & provide access to maintain compliance with pollutant loadings for specific watersheds consistent with outside agencies in consideration of MPCA quality standards Floatable Pollutants Pollutant Loadings for Watersheds