Laserfiche WebLink
• Traffic volumes (under contract, just one hauler sending trucks out for collection, open <br />hauling would generate more traffic). <br />• Collection days/zones (currently all recycling is collected on an every other Monday <br />schedule). <br />• Ordinance updates (if shifting to open hauling system) necessary to ensure haulers <br />provide tonnage data for reporting purposes and specified collection days/zones should <br />the City want to limit the days that trucks can be in neighborhoods. <br />• Potential reduction in materials recycled, which means more materials being landfilled <br />(based on data from Anoka County, generally speaking cities that contract for recycling <br />services tend to have greater participation, greater tonnages of recycled materials and <br />more successful programs. Two exceptions would be Andover and Coon Rapids, but <br />both of these cities also offer a recycling center for their residents to drop off materials <br />year round). <br />• Education and information for residents. <br />Funding for Ramsey's recycling program is provided by the state through the Select Committee <br />on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE). The state distributes the SCORE funding to each <br />county and then each county allocates those monies to the municipalities. In Anoka County, <br />each municipality receives a base of $10,000 plus $5.08 per household. In 2010, Ramsey's <br />allocation of SCORE monies was $49,872.92. <br />The Anoka County Board of Commissioners annually establishes recycling goals for each <br />municipality, which is typically the equivalent of recycling 175 pounds per person. The County <br />allocates the SCORE funding to the municipalities to assist them in meeting their tonnage goal. <br />Each municipality must enter into a recycling agreement with the County, which specifies certain <br />program requirements, to be eligible to receive this funding. Ramsey uses the SCORE dollars to <br />cover expenses associated with the spring and fall recycling events, to promote waste reduction <br />and recycling in the community, for educational outreach purposes and to reimburse salary <br />expenses specifically related to recycling activities. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff can see benefits and drawbacks with each option. Having a contract for curbside recycling <br />service ensures service to each household and helps limit the amount of vehicles on the roads <br />collecting material; however, this also does eliminate choice of hauler for a household. Another <br />option the Finance Committee may want to consider is the possibility of conducting a <br />community survey to get feedback from residents on what they would prefer. However, timing <br />may become problematic (current contract requires a minimum of three [3] months notice prior <br />to expiration if the City intends to request a renewal). <br />Due to the potential drop in participation and the subsequent reduction of materials recycled, <br />Staff would recommend continuing the use of a contract for recycling service either by opting to <br />renew the current contract for an additional two (2) year period or issuing a RFP for recycling <br />services to begin in January, 2011. <br />