Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the Applicant has stated the reasoning for requesting an accessory structure closer to the <br />front property line than the principal structure, herein incorporated as reference. <br />10. That the Applicant combined two parcels into one at the County level, and then in 2005 <br />received a variance from the City of Ramsey to split the property back into two adjoining <br />parcels. However, the Applicant did not act upon this variance and this remains one <br />property.. <br />11. That splitting of the lot is not permitted without removing the new accessory structure or <br />without construction of a principal structure on the resulting new lot. <br />12. That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally <br />apply to other properties in the district; namely, the Subject Property is in the Critical River <br />Overlay District. <br />13. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br />14. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have <br />additional garage space on the premises. <br />15. That the Subject Property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. <br />16. That the plight is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property and is not created by <br />the Applicant. <br />17. That the Variance will not alter the locality's essential character <br />18. That economic circumstances alone do not create the undue hardship. <br />19. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br />20. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property. <br />21. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public <br />street. <br />22. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. <br />23. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br />neighborhood. <br />24. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />25. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that are <br />denied to other owners of land in the same district. <br />RESOLUTION #10-05-100 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />