My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/27/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 07/27/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:42:23 PM
Creation date
7/22/2010 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Gladhill stated that the City used to issue temporary sign .permits. He asked <br />for Council direction on whether or not to bring that back. He talked about time allotment for <br />signs and what was allowed. We tried to be more flexible but we did not want them to become a <br />nuisance. <br />Councilmember Look talked about some sign cases and referenced Hopkins. Because of that, we <br />basically relaxed our ordinance. If we are going to start permitting signs, we will also have to <br />regulate real estate signs, etc. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated maybe we don't regulate <br />Mr. Gladhill suggested we could base. it on size of sign. <br />Councilmember Dehen inquired if all the signs <br />temporary signs. He felt that signs take away <br />the right-of--way. Some of these are no bra' <br />temporary sign they get a permit and put the <br />Planning Manager Miller x <br />regulated according to size. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would like to <br />see it permitted 10 weeks out of the <br />something on the sign d wl <br />like to see Realtor on p p <br />right-of--way. <br />the weekend. <br />in and it was <br />way at all and he would like to <br />e weeks and he would like <br />layed. He stated he would <br />be removed if they are in the <br />to real estate signs such as those put <br />that our Code describes temporary signs as anything <br />and added that he i~ <br />use. He agreed with <br />l have Realtor signs. We need to figure out square. footage <br />larger than the average Realtor sign having to be a permitted <br />'s idea of coming up with a decal or permit right on the sign. <br />Councilmember Wise state~ie did not feel it is a god idea to go after these real estate signs. He <br />mentioned all the signs for the Town Center and Jim Deal's property. He would like to see real <br />estate signs exempted. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill commented that we have to be careful how we word that as it cannot <br />be content based and that's what it would appear if we exempt real estate signs in general. <br />ion were considered <br />should be nothing in <br />neone is putting up a <br />Councilmember McGlone stated that anything in the right-of--way is out. He likes the idea of <br />having anything over the size of a "typical real estate" sign have to be permitted. He added that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.