My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/09/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 08/09/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:43:11 PM
Creation date
8/5/2010 3:20:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/09/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1) Update on Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill reviewed staff s report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated the memorandum of understanding was obvious and he was not <br />sure why there needed to be one. He asked if the property owner had been notified. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill responded the property owner had been notified, but if Council would <br />not support this, there would be no point in discussing this further property owner. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey stated this was not the property own :l?r9Jlktitand he did <br />should talk to her.,;:',',,' <br /> <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the concern was that this wo <br />Plan approval if it was not approved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated he would not vote on this <br />had to say. He noted the City did not bring this an.,.... e <br />consult with the City about this before the elevent~::~~pr. <br />~..--''''*, _m "J. <br />~~tf <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he believed':~b~~8J?erty owner c~~;::!o tbe City about this and he <br />believed the City should align with the Pl\\l~~~fwn~! and help:.~;;owner out. He noted this <br />was the fastest, easiest, and effective way to"~solve tn~i~H!?' He jifaicated he was in favor of it. <br />-:':::, _ ~.~;' " \~'<)C';';:~~f::~~::;~~):":: <br />~:t'-'if" .:',,, _,'( <~"'> <br />Associate Planner GladhlJ:l::dt.. . believe the p~perty ownel?'had legal counsel representing her, <br />but did have a family w!ifuber re. her.')~ .; <br />..' :;;;~~{;;, ;/, ~j;:..,. <br />Councilmember Look sh\\iSl::..the owner dfa'have legal representation, but he was not <br />licensed in the ofMiriif" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />",.%>+ --""~~>~~' <br />Mayor ~sey stated' .b.~:h,ad alf:;ts~ue with getting one of the citizens to sign something they <br />sho,;..!~..;~.1,J..:;..:,..~ave to do. ';' " . <br />T _ _ _ _ _ \:;~~ <br />;<f~::;:<t)__;"~:,<,, '~,',;~:'___' ~ <br />AssociateP~r Gladhill sf~d this was an agreement with the City and the County only. <br />~:~*:E:~t~~~;~~" ~~~:~ <br />';"<<:" . .il <br />Councilmember ~~li stated;~lle City or the County did not own the property and he wanted the <br />-;;.::,' "-",- "', <br />property owner to sl:gg;;:~;t.l~h it. <br />V~>:t::::_'- <br />?~"j <br />Councilmember Wise aid not think the property owner should have to pay for anything. <br /> <br />Planner Manager Miller responded the only intent on meeting with the property owner was for <br />staff to ensure the property owner would be protected by the MOU. <br /> <br />It was Council's consensus to bring have staff talk to the property owner and bring this back to <br />the Council at a future meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.