My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/29/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2010
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/29/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 1:42:44 PM
Creation date
8/18/2010 1:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Elvig said we used to escrow for the first sealcoat to which Mr. Olson reported <br />we still do that. <br />Councilmember Elvig wondered how we could get an endowment like Minnetonka. <br />City Administrator Ulrich commented that cities used to be able to do that but the courts made <br />that go away. <br />Councilmember Wise commented on pazk fees and asked instead of having that go to parks -set <br />a percentage (25% or so) and put in a fund to start a maintenance fund for parks -then that <br />amount will grow. <br />Finance Officer Lund stated you cannot use park dedication fees for pazk maintenance <br />Councilmember Dehen suggested taking less percentage for park dedication and take fees for <br />other things. <br />Councilmember Elvig wondered if the storm water management fees could be used for roads and <br />suggested maybe if we add curb we could use those fees. <br />Mr. Ulrich stated we could try to expand on these types of funds. <br />Mayor Ramsey asked if we are trying to lean in one direction here or just throwing around ideas. <br />He stated that 50% of our City wants to be rural - 50% is more dense and they like that. If you <br />aze going to be dense there should be some benefit for these people. He stated he is in favor of <br />keeping assessments, as the fairest way is to do assessments. <br />Councilmember Look stated that there is a lot of talk about transportation taxing districts - we do <br />have the State's authority to do that. The issue becomes that of general fund taxation -the <br />dollars would be tied to our looming road problems. He asked what it costs annually and what is <br />the shortfall. <br />Mr. Olson stated we have 178 miles of roads. <br />Councilmember Look stated that this economic storm as we see it is this yeaz - in 2012, we may <br />be coming out of it. In two to three years -what's the ramifications to the general fund to fix <br />roads that have to be fixed. What roads in the next three years absolutely have to be replaced - <br />look at the ramifications of these expenditures. <br />Mr. Olson stated that our maintenance costs continue to rise. We will "squeeze" but each year <br />we need more. <br />Councilmember Look stated he is in favor of'assessing additional maintenance to the property <br />owner if they overrode the assessment. <br />City Council Work Session -June 29, 2010 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.