My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/24/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 08/24/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
8/19/2010 3:08:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/24/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 9 <br />RECOMMENDATION 5.1. Draw the boundary of District E to conform to the <br />proposed definition given for District E. <br />When District E is used on or near a bluff face, it generally stands in contradiction to the draft <br />definition provided for District E. That draft definition suggests that, "land in this district is not <br />readily visible from the river surface or opposite bank." Clearly, however, some areas <br />designated as District E do not fit this definition. The bluffs of places like the Mississippi River <br />Gorge and St. Paul's Highwood Hills and West Side neighborhoods are clearly visible from the <br />river, but these areas have been included in District E. <br />Comprehensively, the areas that currently are in District E that do not fit this proposed <br />definition are found in Cottage Grove's River Acres and Mississippi Dunes Golf Course, Inver <br />Grove Heights (above Concord St), Lilydale, Maplewood's Fish Creek area, Mendota, Mendota <br />Heights, Minneapolis and St. Paul's Gorge neighborhoods, St. Paul's Highwood Hills <br />neighborhood, Mounds Park neighborhood, West Seventh neighborhood, West Side <br />neighborhood, as well as the blufflands in South St. Paul. If necessary, we could provide <br />photographic evidence that most of these blufflands are "readily visible from the river surface or <br />opposite bank". <br />RECOMMENDATION 5.2. Establish a clear threshold: all parcels within one-tenth <br />of a mile of a bluff or the river's edge should be ineligible to become District E. <br />We propose that District E should be redrawn to encompass only those areas that have little <br />unique impact on the river corridor's ecological, cultural, and scenic resources. Even the <br />blufftops of many areas have very significant impacts on the river's resources – think of the view <br />of Lilydale from Crosby Farm Regional Park. <br />Even Minneapolis — which has among the most incomplete Critical Area codes — delineates a <br />different height standard for areas within 100 feet of a blufftop, than for areas outside of the <br />bluff. We believe that all lands within a tenth of a mile of the blufftop should in no case be <br />placed in District E. Rather, District E should be reserved for those areas which clearly do not <br />impact our ability to protect corridor resources. <br />In rural areas such as Ramsey and Dayton, this would mean the land beyond Dayton River Road <br />and US 10 should become District E. As described under Principle 2 above, bringing District E <br />any closer to the river than that will upset a delicate and critical long-standing balance <br />surrounding open space preservation that has existed in Ramsey and Dayton. Instead, most of <br />Draft District E should become District B in these areas, as described above. <br />In urbanized areas including Champlin, Anoka, Coon Rapids, and the Gorge through Minneapolis <br />and St. Paul, the areas of District E that are within I/10th of a mile of bluffs or the river's edge <br />should generally either become District C, or alternately District A. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.