My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/16/2010 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/16/2010 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:04:09 AM
Creation date
9/10/2010 1:53:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
09/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In a private residential setting, requir- <br />ing permits for users or placing stations in <br />existing carports where the person leases <br />the space can help avoid more sophisti- <br />cated stations where a pass is required. <br />While electricity is the main cost, mainte- <br />nance and replacement of stations is an- <br />other factor. <br />Commercial uses, especially larger <br />shopping centers, wilt also face many of <br />the same issues. Commercial entities are <br />already requesting installation of stations <br />at existing developments, weft ahead of <br />the development of regulations at the lo- <br />cal level. Surface parking lots at medium <br />and large shopping centers wit! likely pose <br />the greatest challenges due to the layout <br />of parking tots, pedestrian traffic between <br />parking lanes; shopping carts, and other <br />physical obstacles. <br />While private landowners will ulti- <br />mately have to deal with their own liabili- <br />ties, local governments have a duty to keep <br />people safe and reduce potential hazards. <br />Communities wilt have to work with stake- <br />holders to determine the best locations for <br />charging stations, taking into consideration <br />convenience, safety, and other factors prior <br />to amending the local zoning ordinance. <br />Setting aside parking spaces for EV <br />users at existing commercial centers with <br />surface parking tots can also create parking <br />congestion. Transforming existing parking <br />spaces into charging stations will reduce <br />the number of spaces allowed for general <br />use. Local governments wilt need to review <br />requests on a development -by -development <br />basis to determine how congested existing <br />parking is and what the effect will be of tak- <br />ing spaces away from all users. <br />As communities continue to grow, they <br />can avoid many of the challenges presented <br />by retrofitting by requiring the installation <br />and set -aside of recharging spaces in a safe <br />and efficient manner for new developments. <br />The next section looks at how some commu- <br />nities are addressing the issues discussed <br />earlier for new development, including ini- <br />tiatives and incentives by states and groups <br />like the U.S. Green Building Council. <br />EXISTING INITIATIVES <br />Major financial incentives are in place to get <br />people to consider purchasing EVs. The IRS <br />is offering a $7,50o tax credit for the pur- <br />chase of an EV, and states have additional <br />incentives, with California and Georgia each <br />providing $q,000 in additional tax credits. <br />Many state governments also provide grants <br />to help consumers pay for the cost of charg- <br />ing stations at their homes. Meanwhile, <br />millions of dollars have been doted out to <br />companies for continued research and de- <br />velopment to improve related technologies. <br />Since there is a strong effort to get EVs <br />on the streets, there needs to be a similar <br />effort to get charging stations on the streets. <br />The strongest initiative for providing charging <br />stations is occurring in California's Bay Area. <br />The mayors of San Francisco, Oakland, and <br />plug-in electric vehicles. While this is <br />important since demand will be higher in <br />these neighborhoods, it is likely difficult <br />to determine who wilt buy plug-in vehicles <br />until a profile can be made after vehicles <br />are widely available. Furthermore, since <br />one of the major efforts is to instalt charg- <br />ing stations at owners' homes, public sta- <br />tions should be focused on places of more <br />frequent activity when users are away <br />from home. <br />Communities will have to work with <br />stakeholders to determine the best locations <br />for charging stations, taking into consideration <br />convenience, safety, and other factors prior to <br />amending the local zoning ordinance. <br />San Jose have developed a partnership to <br />get charging stations placed in communities <br />throughout the region. These cities are also <br />looking to enhance their municipal fleets by <br />purchasing more EVs. Currently, seven com- <br />munities in the Bay Area and Northern Cali- <br />fornia have installed charging stations. <br />King County, Washington, through the <br />American Recovery and Reinvestment Act <br />(stimulus package) and financial assistance <br />from King County municipalities, approved <br />of the installation of zoo charging stations <br />on county -owned lands. Users wilt be able <br />to access the stations by making an online <br />reservation. <br />The county is still in the process of deter- <br />mining where to place most of the stations. Sb <br />far, it has placed Levet I (no volt) units at park - <br />and -ride carpooling lots throughout the county <br />as part of an initiative to promote plug-in car <br />use prior to the unveiling of the Chevrolet Volt <br />and the Nissan Leaf. There are no Level II sta- <br />tions currently installed, but the county's trans- <br />portation department is working with the Puget <br />Sound Regional Council (Seattle's regional <br />MPO) to determine the best locations. How- <br />ever, only 25 percent of the funding for installa- <br />tion of Level II stations is designated for public <br />chargers; most funds are being allocated for <br />installations at private residences. White Level <br />III station installation is not part of this rollout, <br />the county recognizes the eventual need for <br />strategically located fast -charging stations. <br />Part of King County's effort in deter- <br />mining the location of public charging sta- <br />tions is trying to predict which neighbor- <br />hoods have residents likely to purchase <br />The county has partnered regionally <br />with Oregon and British Columbia representa- <br />tives to understand where stations should be <br />located for travel between southern Oregon <br />and Vancouver on the I-5 corridor. This study <br />is in its infancy, but is important to make sure <br />EV owners are not stymied from travel due to <br />a tack of stations. Along with the EV project, <br />King County is also working to make sure us- <br />ers can find EV stations by GPS. Nissan will <br />offer this feature with the purchase of a Leaf. <br />Finally, another important King County <br />regional initiative is the creation ofa model <br />ordinance to help municipalities understand <br />how the stations can be installed, in which <br />land -use areas they can be located, and what <br />local permits are required.The main goal of <br />this is to make sure all municipalities across <br />King County properly install and locate charg- <br />ing stations. Another important use for the <br />model ordinance is to help potential purchas- <br />ers have transparency with dealerships by <br />making sure the locations where the vehicles <br />will be used will allow the installation of <br />charging stations. The ordinance was not <br />complete as of the date of publication. <br />Many public charging stations will <br />also be used for charging municipal fleet <br />vehicles. Although the installation effort is <br />admirable, current policies concerning the <br />number and type of units installed should <br />be scrutinized by other communities looking <br />to install charging stations. <br />For example, in Martinez, California, <br />three no Volt units were installed for public <br />use and for charging four municipal vehicles. <br />These Levet I units will take at least five hours <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.10 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIAilON !paleI 5 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.