Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt the resolution adopting Findings of Fact favorable to the applicant's request <br />relating to the City of Ramsey HRA's request for an interim use permit to deviate from sign <br />restrictions established in City Code. <br />Further Discussion <br />Discussion ensued regarding Findings of Fact Number 20. <br />Motion amended by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by <br />that City Council adopt the resolution adoptingY1u <br />request relating to the City, of Ramsey HRA's r u t <br />sign restrictions established in City Code with it) <br />sign is part of the original signage and vision of <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson <br />Cleveland. Voting No: None. Absent: Comr. <br />Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seco <br />Council adopt the resolution granting <br />restrictions at 7157 Highway 10 NW, <br />same. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: <br />Cleveland. Voting No: None. 1 <br />Case #2: Public <br />Levine <br />Citizen Input <br />Scoy to recommend <br />e to the applicant's <br />mit to deviate from <br />MTh the proposed <br />Rogers. <br />Scoy, and <br />recommend that City <br />use it to deviate from sign <br />'Fact, and declaring terms of the <br />oners Brauer, Van Scoy, and <br />, and Rogers. <br />for an fnterim Use Permit to Exceed Sign <br />Located at 14550 Armstrong Blvd. NW; Case of <br />hearing to order at 7:28 p.m. <br />presented the staff report. <br />Mr. Lazan stated they' not proposing an Architectural cap on this sign, the structure is unique <br />and the sign is likely to be removed with any reconfiguration of Armstrong Boulevard. They are <br />looking to infill the panels only on this particular sign. <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated she thought the size of the sign is encouraging people to use <br />Armstrong Boulevard rather than Ramsey Boulevard. <br />Planning Commission /August 5, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />