Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Look noted if traffic drastically increased, that would cause a problem on <br />Variolite also. <br />Councilmember Dehen arrived at 5:49 p.m. <br />Councilmember Elvig .stated his main concern was the decrease in property values for the <br />homeowners. He asked if the City wanted to ghost plat this at this time. <br />Councilmember Wise recommended if the City was going to ghost plat this, to shift the road to <br />the north for minimal impact to the residents. <br />Councilmember Look stated he was in favor of striking this, as the City did not know if the road <br />would ever be put in and the impact from the Peterson development. He indicated he did not like <br />lines on maps. He did not believe this served a purpose at this time. City Engineer Himmer <br />responded if the line was taken off the map, any of the properties could propose to subdivide. <br />Councilmember Elvig requested staff look at an alternative route that would go to the north that <br />would have less impact on the residents or property value and encourage the opportunity to look <br />at that as a connection. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated the reality was there was needed transportation and people wanted <br />corridors for transportation. He noted eventually the corridors had to be established and plan for <br />the future as to where roads would go, even if the decision were not populaz. <br />Mayor Ramsey agreed the City should move the line slightly north. City Engineer Himmer <br />noted not only property impacts needed to be considered, but also environmental impacts had to <br />be considered which might make this proposal too expensive to complete. <br />It was Council's consensus to move'the road to north. of the tree line. <br />2) Consider Extension of Variolite Street from Alpine Drive to Bunker' Lake <br />Boulevard <br />City Engineer Himmer presented the staff report. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated this workshop would not allow time for public comments, but he was in <br />favor of holding another open house, if necessary. <br />Councilmember Wise stated development had a way of finding the best use for the properties <br />that could be developed and when lines were put on a map it was a "taking" and he believed this <br />was an infringement on property rights. He stated he was in favor of taking this completely out <br />of the plan. He agreed the cost was excessive also. <br />Councilmember Elvig also believed there had to be some plan there, but he recommended this <br />not be moved forwazd. <br />City Council Work Session /September 14, 2010 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />