My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/26/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council - 10/26/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:47:16 PM
Creation date
10/21/2010 2:48:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case # 9.07 <br />CONSIDER SUPPORTING RESPONSE FROM THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL AND CURRENT ISSUES <br />IN REGARD TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA (MRCCA) RULES <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Associate Planner <br />Background: <br />The 2009, Minnesota Legislature directed the DNR to establish rules for (Laws 2009, Chapter 172, <br />Article 2, Section 5(e) and Section 27) for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA). The <br />Legislation revised portions of Chapter 116G, and specified that rulemaking must commence by January <br />15, 2010 and include 30 day advance notification to local government units (counties, cities, townships, <br />etc.) within the MRCCA. <br />Observations: <br />Many surrounding agencies have joined with the City of Saint Paul to issue a Joint Statement responding to the <br />draft rules for the update of the MRCCA. Metro Cities, an association that follows legislative issues pertaining <br />to municipalities within the Metropolitan Council jurisdiction, has requested that communities affected by the <br />current rules update to the MRCCA pass resolutions of support of this joint statement. <br />Funding: <br />Drafting and processing the ordinance is covered under regular City Staff time. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff would also like to take this opportunity to clarify select issues with the current ordinance that exists. The first <br />issue is in regard to which regulations legally apply to this area (MRCCA and Wild /Scenic Rivers). The second is in <br />regard to an ordinance standard that states a vacant parcel must be held in separate ownership from abutting lots to be <br />considered a buildable lot. <br />City Code Section 117 -145 (1) states that the MRCCA rules shall apply to those areas legally described by Minnesota <br />State Executive Order No. 7919, and clearly only would apply to certain areas along the Mississippi River. City Code <br />Sec. 117 -253 (a) states that the provisions of this subdivision shall apply within the designated Scenic River Land Use <br />District of the Rum River in accordance with the property descriptions contained in MN Rules pt. 6105.1400. City <br />Code Sec. 117 -254 (b) states that the Scenic River Land Use District shall be shown on the official zoning map, as shall <br />the urban and rural area portions of the district contained therein. The plain language of these sections of City Code <br />seem to indicate that the Wild and Scenic Overlay only applies to certain properties along the Rum River. The <br />Minnesota DNR has consistently held that the Wild and Scenic Overlay also applies to the Mississippi River, creating <br />multiple overlays and overlap of regulations. Ramsey City Code does not currently reflect this. <br />City Code Sec. 117 -148 (b) (3) states that lots of record in the office of the county register of deeds (or registrar of titles) <br />prior to the date of enactment of the ordinance from which this subdivision is derived, which do not meet the <br />requirements of section 117 -148 (a) may be allowed building sites provided that the lot is in separate ownership of <br />abutting lands. The DNR has responded that this is to be interpreted as to mean that the lot must be in separate <br />ownership at the time of sale or development. City Staff and the City Attorney interpret this standard as meaning the <br />lot needed to be held in separate ownership at the time the ordinance became effective (circa August, 1985). A copy of <br />the DNR response is attached for your review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.