Laserfiche WebLink
Case #1: Public Hearing — Request for a Home Occupation Permit to Operate a Lawn <br />Care and Landscape Service at 14200 Tungsten St. NW; Case of Justin Dahl <br />Public Hearing <br />Vice Chairperson Van Scoy called the public hearing to order at 7:04 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Associate Planner Gladhill presented the staff report. .404 <br />Citizen Input <br />Justin Dahl, 14200 Tungsten Street, the applicant stated <br />are there only three or four times a week. The empl <br />on the street in front of the house. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated the ordinance state <br />of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., however it is encouraged to <br />home occupation. IhkI <br />'ees to to the house <br />are park the driveway or <br />the street dfiring the hours <br />driveway when it is related to a <br />Mr. Dahl stated the business owns three ve 'c as two trail the house, a bobcat not at <br />his house, blazer not at his house, a Ford 0 an t his se. He stated he does very <br />minimal onsite maintenance on his vehicles. he ' 2 ack trailer, red F150 and black <br />Ford F350 are stored out ' - minued tha a tries to p them uniformly, he does the best <br />he can to keep it neat. <br />Vice Chairperson Van ask this were not' home business would the parking be an <br />issue._ <br />Ler G tate d r an acre six vehicles are allowed by City Code, and there <br />with the �, er of s iust the commercial nature of the use. <br />Mr. Dahl sTOWe thinks an of fence would look worse than his trailer does. <br />Commissioner and asjp what was the purpose of the privacy fence. <br />Associate Planner Gll stated that the fence is for screening purposes, the residential off <br />street parking ordinance states that commercial use vehicles and equipment must be 75% <br />screened. <br />Discussion ensued regarding screening of the trailer and difference between screening of trailers <br />and vehicles. <br />