Agenda - Council - 05/14/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Board Member Brauer questioned whether this would meet the Standards in the old Code and what the standards are for the new Code. Principal Planner Trudgeon replied the new standard is 25 feet in R-2 districts. The setback variance is being requested for the new standards. Board Member Brauer asked if this meets all the standards for buffering, etc. Community Development Director Frolik said it does not. She guided to follow the new rules, though it hasn't worked in every' applicable at this point. A variance may not be granted' for required in the future. )ers-are being are not will be Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by __ adopting Findings of Fact # favorable .to request for a variance. Nixt, to ~t Resolution # Development's Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson No: Board Member Brauer. Absent: Board Memt Reeve, and Kociscak. Voting Motion by Board Member Johnson, Development's request for a variance to adopt Resolution #02-05- ,. terms to approve Edina Zoning District and Motion carried. Votin No: Board Member Absent:: Nixt, Members Johnson and Kociscak. Voting Sweet, and Watson. Case #3 Re~ : Alpine Setbacks for the Proposed Plat of Case of Eighty-Seven LLC. Pubiicil:Ieai-ing Ch~erson Nixt '1 kg to order at 7:45 p.m. Presa~t~fion Pnnc~pal PIa~er. ~d~on noted EighW-Seven LLC is proposing to 'subdivide land on the southwest co~'~.??~}~S'tate HW. 47 and Alp~e Dr. ~to 42 tow~ome units. ~e prope~ is zoned R3-U whi~h'allows for tow~omes up to a densiW of seven u~ts p~ acre. states that the ~ont yard setback for buildings located ~ ~e R3-U Zo~ng Dis~ct be setback 35 feet ~om the edge of the right-of-way. ~e applicant is requesting a 1 O-foot vad~ce to have tow~ouse units setback 25 feet ~om the public fight-of-way. He said ths parcel i~ u~que, given its location on T.H. ~ 47. There is li21e oppo~W for creativiW. CiW Staffreco~ends Board of Adjustment/May 4, 2002 Page 6 of 10 -203-