Laserfiche WebLink
restricts lot coverage to 35% and the site plan indicates a total of 47,550 square feet of <br />space being constructed. Lot coverage on the subject property will be approximately <br />meets City Code requirements, The buildings are setback at least 40 feet <br />perimeter of the parcel. In accordance with the variance ganted earlier <br />structures are also set back 25 feet from the edge of the public street right o: <br />townhome units along private drives are located less than 25 feet from the <br />contrary to adopted City policy. The developer will be required to arran <br /> <br />to meet the 25-foot driveway length requirement. The applicant is <br />construct a temporary cul-de-sac approximately 850 feet in len <br />review and permitting process of the Lower Rum River <br />WMO). The City has engaged the services of SKF to <br />determined a 6 to I 0 foot wall would be required for this >pment, <br />responsible. A Landscape Plan has been submitted ,.generally <br />City's minimum standards. City Staff will the <br />regarding the plan at a future date. The R3-U <br />buffer when a development is adjacent to R1 and R2 <br />there is landscaping proposed to be located in the buffer area. <br />modified to show additional screem.'ng, at the southern end of the <br />from shining on the structures southern parcels. <br />been discussion between the neighbor about <br />finds this solution acceptable, ~;,ota <br />meeting, the applicant has reviewed th~'~dscaping <br />along the southwestern property line. Sfaff.,is <br /> <br />compliance with City Staff review letter <br />to the front-yard setback, and cul-de-sac <br /> <br />A1 Kemp[. !;5!20 St. Fran~5 Boulevard, <br />southwest. ~i""and not 'sani~ sewer and <br /> <br />Commissioner'Johnson.p6inte¢[ ou~ <br />effective screening;:. <br /> <br /> the <br /> the <br /> ." curb, ~s <br /> townhou: <br /> a variance <br /> ject to the' <br /> Organization <br />no~se level study. They <br /> :which the developer <br /> and meets the <br /> make comments <br /> loot landscaped <br /> plan shows that <br /> has been <br /> headlights <br /> that there has <br /> a fence. Staff <br /> Commission <br /> landscape screening <br /> <br /> g approval contingent upon <br /> applicant receiving variances <br />subdivision approval. <br /> <br /> there is only storm sewer along the <br /> <br />will take some time to grow enough to provide <br />more effective. <br /> <br />~(!i~:C~'g; :,fr0m Shade T.~g~Constructmn, stated several neighbors came to the December Plannmg <br /> Co~msmn meeting ~dt mentioned they would prefer a fence, or ~ees, or :a combination. He <br /> said he wb'flt~a not like to ~(:~}~a :+~:~'Fence ~f' the neighbors' did not want it. <br /> <br /> Principal Pla~ Tmdg~Bh suggested a meeting be held be~een the neighbors, Staff ~d <br /> developer to a~ee on the type of screening Cey prell. <br /> <br /> Md.tio~b~-¢Co~issioner Jonson, seconded by Co~issioner Kocisc~, to reco~end that <br /> Cit~;C0Uncil approve the site plan for Alpine Meadows contingent upon compliance with CiW <br /> S.mff'-review le~er dated April 26, 2002, the applic~t receiving vmances to ~e ~ont-y~d <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 4, 2002 <br /> Page 5 of 24 <br /> <br />-200- <br /> <br /> <br />