Laserfiche WebLink
City Code ?~quires a minimum of 40% open space, 10% of which must be identified as a common area <br />for use by residents of the development. The development exceeds open space requirements. <br /> <br />The development will be serviced by municipai water and sewer. <br /> <br />The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Rivenwick 3rd Addition at their August <br />meeting. The Park Commission is recommending an 8 foot-trail along Riverdale Drive extending from <br />the western boundary line to Garnet Street. The trail will continue to extend along the northwest side of <br />Riverdale Park to the eastern edge of the park. Park dedication is recommended to be satisfied by a cash <br />payment. <br /> <br />The project is subject to the review and permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed <br />Management Organization (WMO). <br /> <br />MnDot requested that the City look at how the traffic noise generated from U.S. Highway #10 affects the <br />proposed townhouse development. It should be noted that the closest townhouse unit to U.S. Highway <br />#10 is approximately 750 feet. Staff engaged the services of SRF Consulting firm to verify what <br />requirements, if any, should be taken to address traffic noise from U.S. Highway #10. SRF has concluded <br />that no noise mitigation should be required as the traffic noise levels do not exceed MPCA standards. <br /> <br />The proposed townhouse development is required to Comply with the newly adopted Density <br />Transitioning Ordinance. The developer is proposing to satisfy density-transitioning requirements by the <br />Landscape Buffering option. The Density Transitioning Ordinance states that when an R-2 Medium <br />Residential Development abuts a R-1 Single Family development the developer must provide a 25 foot <br />wide buffer, in common ownership, with a minimum of 2 over story trees, 2 evergreen trees, and 2 under <br />stow trees per 100 feet of property abutting the adjacent R-1 district. In this case, the development <br />would be required to provide 72 trees. An established berm is located on the subject property that <br />contains approximately 344 established over story and under story trees. The berm and adjacent open <br />space area significantly exceeds 25 feet and will be manicured and maintained by the Home Owners <br />Association. The townhouse development significantly exceeds landscape buffering density- <br />transitioning requirements. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the preliminary plat on September 5, <br />2002. During the public hearing, a few citizens inquired about how the proposed ponds would be <br />maintained, what the proposed tot lot would consist of, and how the increase in traffic would affect the <br />intersection of Riverdale Drive and Garnet Street. · <br /> <br />The Planning Commission tabled the item on September 5, 2002 and directed staff engage the services of <br />a consulting firm to conduct a traffic generation analysis for the proposed development, discuss with the <br />developer the cost of upgrading the existing signals on U.S. Highway #10 and how the cost is tO be <br />distributed, and provide clarification on how the existing berm will be maintained, <br /> <br />The Planning Commission met on October 10, 2002 and continued to review the proposed Rivenwick <br />3rd Addition development. There was no citizen input during the continuatiOn of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Staff engaged the services of SRF to complete a traffic generation analysis for the proposed <br />development. The traffic generation analysis concluded that all key intersections with the exception of <br />Sunfish Lake Blvd and Highway #10 will operate at acceptable levels of service with full buildout of the <br />proposed development. The intersection of Sunfish Lake Blvd. and Highway #10 is scheduled to be <br />improved with dual southbound left turn lanes and separate left turn, through and right turn lanes on the <br />northbound leg. The poor level of service at this intersection is due to the general increase in traffic on <br />Highway #10 and not solely based on the proposed townhouse development. <br /> <br />68- ~ <br /> <br /> <br />