Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed detached accessory building will be located in the rear yard to the northwest of the <br />principal dwelling. The proposed accessory building location exceeds the ten (10) foot side yard <br />and five (5) foot rear yard setbacks established in the Rural Developing Bulk Standards. There is <br />an existing driveway leading to the proposed site. The applicant stated that an approach would <br />be installed. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this application on October 3, 2002. At said <br />meeting, the applicant presented a letter of support signed by ten neighborhood residents. <br />However, also on October 3, 2002, the Northfork Architectural Review Committee sent a letter <br />to City Staff stating that they were not inclined to approve the current plans. The applicant than <br />stated that the Review Committee agreed to review the plans a second time but had not reached a <br />decision. At this point, the application was tabled, until October 10, 2002 when the Northfork <br />Architectural Review Committee had reached a definitive decision. <br /> <br />On October 10, 2002, the Planning Commission reconvened their regular meeting. On October <br />10, 2002, the Northfork Architectural Review Board faxed a letter to Staff stating that they were <br />not willing to approve Mr. Shappell's request to construct an accessory structure with the <br />existing dimensions (34' x 50'), but, they would be willing to approve a 34' x 30' structure <br />(which would meet City Code). <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br /> The PI ~ming Commission recommended the City Council deny David and Sandra Shappell's <br /> .~for a conditional use permit. <br />  'Council Action: <br /> <br /> ~' MotiOn to adopt Re,s, olution #02-10-~ adopting Findings of Fact # . relating to David <br /> ,'0' and Sandra Shappell s request for a conditional use permit to exceed the accessory building size <br />N,~ restriCtions on the property at 9325 164a Lane NW. <br /> <br />-and- <br /> <br />MotiOn to deny the conditional use permit requestto exceed accessory building size, based on the <br />Findings of Fact # <br /> <br />~or- <br /> <br />MotiOn to approve David and Sandra Shappell's request to exceed accessory <br />restrictions based on the Findings of Fact # __, and adopt Resolution #02-10- <br />terms of same. <br /> <br />building size <br />~ declaring <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />Community Development Director <br />Principal Planner <br />Associate Planner <br />City Attorney <br /> <br /> CC: 10/22/02 <br />-172- <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />