Agenda - Council - 11/26/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

that they will end up in his pasture. He stated he has talked with Ivlr. Peterson who. is willing to leave the existing trees as a barrier and the existing barbed wire fence and cedar post wire mesh Elk fence that is around part of his property, h/ir. Weichet asked the Plann/ng Commission to consider something adequate to keep the kids out of his pasture. He noted that the other neighbor, Mr. Mott, has pastureland and shares the same concern. He stated it appears that Mr. Peterson is willing to take care of this problem so he wants that included in the consideration to assure it happens. ~:~.-~dt&!:and ther~t~:'~!lirr~{atiohs;.~ ~t'oing that. !~'~:e stated that he would be willing to place the . ~.,-!5~::'--;~i:.~,~:f~nC~'c)n:~eir .... (Wilsh~ilt a~d. Mo~) land~.sO~ ~? -:~.~: ....._;-;~.¢~ld ~en be responsible to mainta~ it. '*~;',}~.~¢~ Chaimerson Ni2 state~'ffiat under these circumstances, where they ~e ma~g the request ~d :~'}; the applic~t fS¢.~itling t°;-d0 so, then locating the fence on their lot would address ~e concern ... about the fence:-5'~6ming d6m:. He stated he would not w~t to consider a location ~at involves ':)~;.;smaintenance is~s for ~e CiW. ~::co~s~ioner Jonson asked if ~ey could reach ~at a~eement pr/or to Council consideration. ~-. Weiche~ stated he would be willing to have the fence located on his prope~. David Mott, 15425 County Road 5, stated he has a mutual agreement for pasture land with Mr. Weichett and shares the concerns he expressed to protect the children and his property as Mr. Peterson, Oakwood Land Development, stated he has had conversations at Weichet and they have spoken more tonight. He stated that at the concept re~vi~'h'e ~en~:fied the eight-foot high Elk fence that does nor have barbed wire and is'not vis.:.~:'off~nsive, so~k willing leave that fence,. He displayed a picture and-stated the prop ~-i'S"through the mid~i!.~_ of a thicket and that is where the barbed wire fence is locate& .~?FI~i!~.at~t he would prefer in a shorter fence than an eight-foot high fence. He stated he:wOuld not want ~9 be required install a fence through the wetland due to DNR restrictions. Ai§~he does..not~'tl~nk children will walk through that wetland area. Mr. Peterson ~ked that he be ~ea/~::'~6;k out a mutually ~:~'~- agreeable fencing arrangement with these neiighboi:s.'..He stated th~Y:d~:'~en also decide where it would be located with possible limitations, i'~.(?i; ':i:~:i{:-~.i; ~: ~ Commissioner Kociscatc ask~-'d-Who would maint~n the f~JS~-< Mr. ?eterson smed:: t'would be i~ated on the prbp~ line ~n~i'~'~.~a low or no maintenance fence. He stat~d.:~i~ would be on ~ei¢ lots so, th~.~tically, the resi&'~tts of Wildlife 3rd would be able to take it dog'n~ He statect he is being ask~.~o address the movement of the community's Commissioner Johnson stated it would be better to have that issue resolved prior to Council consideration. Commissioner Reeve asked if a fence exists along that property line now. -158- Planning Commission/November 7, 2002 Page 7 of 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I