12/02/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

9. That the existing structure is located on the lot in such a way as to make impossible to . locate the porch on the rear of the house without encroaching into the rear yard setback. 10. That the rear yard abuts property utilized as a public park. 11. That, if granted, the residential structure will be located no closer than 20 feet from the rear lot line. 12. That the Subject Property can/cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. 13. That, if granted, the variance will/wi11 not increase the congestion in the public street. 14. That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the undue hardship. 15. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 16. That, if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited in the applicable zoning district. 17. That .the City finds that the removal of the existing porch will/will not create an undue hardship. 18. That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. 19. That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the neighborhood. 20. That, if granted, the variance requested .is/is not the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the Applicants. 21. That the unique circumstances on the Subject Property do/do not result from the actions of . the Applicant. 22. That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied to the owners of other land in the same district. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: RESOLUTION #10= Page 2 of 3 13