Laserfiche WebLink
1 -11 State Program Revenue Sources <br />Metro Cities opposes any attempt by the state to finance programs of statewide value and <br />significance with local revenue sources such as municipal utilities or property tax <br />mechanisms.. These local revenue sources are created to finance local government services. <br />Statewide programs, such as the Clean Water Legacy Act, serve important state goals and <br />objectives, and should be financed through traditional state revenue sources such as the <br />income or sales tax. <br />I -S Post Employment Benefits <br />Metro Cities supported 2008 statutory changes that allow local governments to establish <br />trusts from which to fund post- employment health and life insurance benefits for public <br />employees, with participation by cities on a strictly voluntary basis, in recognition that <br />cities have differing local needs and circumstances. Cities should also retain the ability to <br />determine the level of post employment benefits to be provided to employees. <br />I -T Health Care Insurance Programs <br />Metro Cities supports legislative efforts to control health insurance costs, but opposes <br />actions that undermine local flexibility to manage rising insurance costs. Metro Cities <br />encourages a full examination of the rising costs of health care. and-the impacts on city <br />employers and employees. Metro Cities also supports a study of the fiscal impacts to both <br />cities and retirees of pooling retirees separately from active employees. <br />I -U State Budget Stability <br />For the last several years, the State has experienced budget deficits and increased volatility <br />in state revenues. To address state budget shortfalls, the Legislature and Governor have <br />focused their efforts on reductions in expenditures, shifting of costs to other units of <br />government, school payment-delays, and drawing the state budget reserve, Many of <br />these options will not be available to address future state budget shortfalls and the <br />Legislature and Governor must seek solutions that achieve structural budget balance. <br />In 2007, the Legislature and Governor created the State Budget Trends Study Commission <br />to study the implications of state demographic trends on the state's tax base and revenue <br />collections, as well as trends in spending for state programs. The Commission was charged <br />with examining the state budget with regard to budget stability and flexibility and making <br />recommendations for state tax and budget changes that include changes in the tax base, <br />mix of tax types, state and local finance relationships, entitlements and the budget <br />structure. The Commission identified several major demographic and fiscal trends and <br />recommendations to address achieving balance in state revenues and expenditures and <br />managing state budget volatility. <br />2011 Legislative Policies <br />