Laserfiche WebLink
ll -€ 800 MHz Radio System <br />Metro Cities supports the work of the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (previously <br />the Metropolitan Radio Board) in implementing and maintaining the 800 MHz radio <br />system, as long as cities are not forced to modify their current systems or become a part of <br />the 800 MHz Radio System until they so choose. Metro Cities further urges the Legislature <br />to provide cities with the financial means to obtain required infrastructure and subscriber <br />equipment (portable and mobile radios) as well as provide funding for operating costs, <br />since the prime purpose of this system is to allow public safety agencies and other units of <br />government the ability to communicate effectively. <br />11 -F Building Codes <br />In spite of the serious downturn in the construction economy, thousands of new housing <br />units have been constructed annually in the metro area, and when the economy rebounds, <br />building will resume. Structural and water intrusion problems have surfaced in many <br />houses and commercial buildings built in the last 20 years. These. problems have resulted <br />in dissatisfied homeowners and conflicts between the state, builders and cities. <br />Metro Cities supports art equitable distribution of fees from the newly created Construction <br />Code Fund, with proportional distribution based on the area of enforcement where the fees <br />were received. Metro Cities further supports a joint effort by the state, cities and builders <br />to collectively identify appropriate uses for the fund, including education, analysis of new <br />materials and construction techniques, building code updating, building inspector training, <br />development of performance standards and identification of construction "best practices." <br />Metro Cities does not support legislative solutions that fail to recognize the <br />interrelationships between builders, state building codes and cities. <br />IhG Administrative pines <br />Traditional methods of citation, enforcement and prosecution have met with increasing <br />costs to local units of government. The use of administrative fines is a tool to moderate <br />those costs. Metro Cities supported expansion of the 2009 administrative fine authority to <br />allow cities to issue administrative fines for defined local traffic offenses. While the <br />expanded authority is a welcome enhancement, further compromise language is necessary <br />to enhance the workability of the authority. Metro Cities continues to support cities' <br />authority to use administrative fines for regulatory ordinances; such as building codes, <br />zoning codes, health codes, and public safety and nuisance ordinances. Metro Cities <br />supports the use of city administrative fines, at a minimum, for regulatory matters that are <br />not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher level state traffic and criminal offenses. Metro <br />Cities also endorses a fair hearing process before a disinterested third party. <br />10 Metro Cities <br />