My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 4:25:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/07/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Allow TIF eligibility expansion to innovative technological products, recognizing that <br />not only physical items create economic value; <br />• Support changes to TIF law that will facilitate the development of "regional projects:" <br />• Shift TIF redevelopment. policy away from a focus on "blight" and "substandard" to <br />"functionally obsolete" or a focus on long range planning for a particular community, <br />reduction in green house gases or other criteria more relevant to current needs. <br />• Encourage DEED to do an extensive cost - benefit analysis related to redevelopment, <br />including an analysis of the various funding mechanisms, and an analysis of where the <br />cost burden falls with each of the options compared the to the distribution of the <br />benefits of the redevelopment project. <br />• Support TIF for neighborhood recovery efforts in the wake of the foreclosure crisis; <br />• Consider creating an inter - disciplinary TIF team to review local exception TIF <br />proposals, using established criteria, and snake recommendations to the legislature on <br />their passage; and <br />• Metro Cities encourages the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more efficient <br />and streamlined reporting process. <br />III -J Eminent Domain <br />Eminent domain law changes made by the 2006 Legislature resulted in a significant <br />philosophical and legal shift in Minnesota. Whereas prior to 2006, Minnesota law provided <br />extensive deference to local governments, statutory changes enacted in 2006 provide <br />significantly greater deference to property owners. Eminent domain actions for traditional <br />public uses such as streets, parks or sewers will cost more. And except for the most <br />extreme cases of blight or contamination, eminent domain for redevelopment purposes <br />will be nearly impossible at any cost. <br />The proper operation and long term economic vitality of our cities is dependent on the <br />ability of a city, its citizens and its businesses to continually reinvest and reinvent. <br />Reinvestment and reinvention strategies can occasionally conflict with the priorities of <br />individual residents or business owners. Eminent domain is a critical tool in the <br />reinvestment and reinvention process and without it; our cities will be allowed to <br />deteriorate to unprecedented levels before the public will be able to react. Metro Cities <br />strongly encourages the Governor and Legislature to revisit the 2006 eminent domain <br />changes to allow local governments to redevelopment problems before those conditions <br />become financially impossible to address. Specifically, the Legislature should: <br />• Clarify contamination standards; <br />2011 Legislative Policies 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.