Laserfiche WebLink
V -1 Cities Under 5 ; 000 Population <br />Cities under 5,000 in population do not directly receive any non- property tax funds for <br />collector and arterial streets. Current CSAH distributions to metropolitan counties are <br />inadequate to provide for the needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. Criteria, such <br />as the number of average daily trips, should be established in a small city local road <br />improvement program for funding qualification and a distribution method devised. <br />Possible funding sources include the five- percent set -aside account in the Highway User <br />Tax Distribution Fund, modification to county municipal accounts, street improvement <br />districts, and /or state general funds. <br />V -J County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula <br />Even with the additional resources provided by the Legislature through the transportation <br />finance bill, significant needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. The additional <br />revenue for the CSAH system will result in more projects being completed faster, however <br />greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost sharing activities, <br />encumbering an already over - burdened local funding system. When the alternative is not <br />building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of their local systems but also <br />pay upward of fifty percent of county road projects. Metro Cities supports special or <br />additional funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in county <br />road projects. <br />Although only 10 % of the CSAH roads are in the metro area they account for nearly 50 % of <br />the vehicle miles traveled. The new CSAH formula passed by the Legislature will better <br />account for needs in the Metropolitan Area, and the new formula is a first step in providing <br />additional resources for the Metropolitan Area. <br />V -K Municipal Input /Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads <br />Minnesota Statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to submit <br />detailed plans with city cost estimates at a point one and a half to two years prior to bid <br />letting, at which time public hearings are held for citizen /business /municipal input. if <br />MnDOT does not concur with requested changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process <br />would take a maximum of three and a half months and the results of the appeals board are <br />binding on both the city and MnDOT. <br />Metro Cities opposes any changes to the current statute that would allow MnDOT to <br />disregard the appeals board ruling for state trunk highways. The result of such a change <br />would significantly minimize MnDOT's desire or need to negotiate in good faith with a city <br />for appropriate project access and alignment, and it would make the public hearing and <br />appeals process meaningless. <br />38 Metro Cities . <br />