My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2010
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/07/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 4:25:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/07/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session <br />Date: 12/07/2010 <br />By: Tim Himmer <br />Engineering /Public Works <br />Item #: 2. d. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Acquistition of Necessary Right -of -Way for the Potential Future Extension of Variolite Street <br />Background: <br />Over the past several years staff has been contacted on numerous occasions by a few property owners that currently <br />reside along the City streets that would serve as the future alignment of a north -south local collector road through <br />the center of the City and connecting to the COR. They are interested in any information about development and <br />preservation of this corridor, as it has recently been discussed by the Council as the Variolite Street extension, and <br />they continue to request a status update for the project. <br />This topic has been discussed several times over the past year at the Public Works Committee, Finance Committee, <br />and City Council in work session; all of which determined that while the City should be preserving the corridor as <br />part of its long range transportation goals, we should not be actively advancing this project until the need is there; <br />based upon traffic and /or development pressure. It was also discussed that we should not be purchasing any <br />property for this project until a funding source, alignment, and schedule are developed. <br />During the initial review period staff was directed to investigate a process that would initiate the preparation of a <br />right of way plan for State Aid submittal and consideration. Such a plan would determine the proposed alignment <br />and feasibility of constructing the roadway extension; and once approved by MnDOT would result in a funding <br />source for future acquisitions along this corridor. Many alignment scenarios were considered by the various <br />committees but they were ultimately narrowed down to a few potential options (see attached). <br />A public open house was held on August 12, 2010 to introduce the residents of the area with the project, provide <br />them with background information, communicate the long range transportation goals of the City, listen to their <br />thoughts and ideas, and gather feedback on the various alignment options. Over 100 citizens attended the meeting; <br />with 53 people signing the attendance sheet, and 22 comment cards and /or e -mail responses received. <br />At Council work session on September 14, 2010 Council directed staff to keep the project in the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan but to move the alignment consistent with that shown in the Capital Improvement Program <br />(CIP), such that it follows the existing right -of -way to the extent feasible (see attached minutes, and comprehensive <br />plan & CIP maps). Since that meeting one resident has continued with their request for the City to acquire their <br />property. They feel that there may still be an opportunity to proceed with property acquisition from willing sellers <br />at this time and requests the Council consider a process that may take advantage of the current economic condition <br />to preserve this corridor, because (as their letter states) they were "approached by a City Councilman and told that <br />the City would not be opposed to purchasing individual properties at this time." Staff is looking for some <br />clarification and /or consensus from the Council on this matter. They also have concerns about disclosure issues <br />should they choose to list their property for sale, and what impacts that would have on the marketability of their <br />property (see attached correspondence). <br />Regardless of the alignment option chosen for the ultimate project this property would be impacted. Based upon <br />previous direction, with regard to the Variolite Street extension it seems premature to be considering property <br />acquisition at this time unless an alternative funding source can be secured. Without a pre- approved right of way <br />plan at the state level acquisition of land cannot commence utilizing State Aid funds, and reimbursement for such <br />acquisitions that the City undertakes in advance of that approval are non - reimbursible. <br />Council Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.