Agenda - Council - 07/23/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-120- Motion by Councilmember Zimmerrnan, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt Resolution #02~05-127 adopting Findings of Fact # 0612 relating to a request to rezone the subject property from R-1R Single Family Rural to R-1U Single Family Urban. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Zimmerman, Kurak, Anderson, and Henddksen. Voting No: None. Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to introduce an ordinance approving the request to rezone the subject property from R-1R Single Family Rural to R-IU Single Family Urban, based on the findings of facts. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Zimmerman, Hendriksen, Anderson, and Kurak. Voting No: None. Case #5: Request for Preliminary Plat Review of Wildlife Sanctuary 2~a Addition; Case of Oakwood Land Development Community Development Director Frolik stated that Oakwood Land Development has applied for preliminary plat review to replat Lots 1 and 2 of Wildlife Sanctuary Addition located west.of State Highway #47 and south of River Pines residential development. The subject property is 31.66 acres in size. The preliminary plat is proposing to subdivide the subject property into 42 single-family lots for a net density of 2.01 units per acre. The proposed lots meet the m/nimum standard for lot area and lot width. The subdivision is proposing to gain access from State Highway #47 by the extension of 156m Lane. MnDOT will be requiring State Highway #47 to be upgraded to include left and right turn lanes. The preliminary plat is providing two cul-de-sacs into the development that meet the cul-de-sac length restriction established in City Code. An access to the south has been provided to facilitate future development for the proposed Wildlife Sanctuary 3~ Addition and Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 4, Wildlife Sanctuary 2~a Addition. The development of Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 4, will be contingent upon the construction of Iodine Street in Wildlife Sanctuary 3~ Addition. The'City engaged the services of SKF Consulting to conduct a noise mitigation analysis for the project area. The result of the analysis concludes that' noise mitigation measures for the proposed development would not be reasonable since the construction of 156m Lane would limit the effectiveness of a sound barrier. The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending park dedication be satisfied by a cash payment and the Developer continue to work with staff regarding the exact location of a bituminous trail located with_in the development. The City is also reviewing development proposals for Wildlife Sanctuary 3~ Addition to the southwest, Sunflower Ridge to the south, and Evergreen Point to the southeast. The installation of streets, sanitary sewer, municipal water and storm sewer will have to be a coordinated effort between all four proposed development areas. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed prelim/nary plat and held a public hearing on May 2, 2002. There was no citizen input during the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the preliminary plat contingent upon compliance with staff review letter dated April 26, 2002, revised May 24, 2002. City Council/May 28, 2002 Page 11 of 25