Laserfiche WebLink
peninsula and the only way to develop it is by the cul-de-sac. He stated not granting this <br />variance would deprive Royal Oaks of R-1 zoning fights. The special circumstances are not <br />created by the applicant. He stated all homes are single-family lots and meet or exceed the R-1 <br />regulations. <br /> <br />Joe McDilda, <br />recommendations. He said he believes this request is unique in that it is a <br />cul-de-sac. He noted this will have two dead ends and two turnarounds. Ht <br />of the peninsula. He said grading is about 3 feet below the base tree line. <br />how the cul-de-sac will be extended. He said he believes the trees <br />order to make the grade match what is already there. He also raised <br />that will be necessary for the development of the lots. He noted.: <br />of fill. He stated the trees cannot exist with that much fill. A <br />required a halt to tree removal by the developer until a tree <br />recommended the Planning Commission reject the vari~ <br />added the cul-de-sac should go no further than the [stance <br /> <br />14321 Neon St. N.W., passed out a memo stating points for consideration and <br /> <br /> lots <br /> in the last <br /> ordinance is <br />this ordinance is <br /> <br />on top of a <br />pictures <br />an issue in <br />be removed in <br />of fill <br />30 feet <br />:eting <br /> He <br /> <br />cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked how Mr. McDilda would propose <br /> <br />adding the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Mr. McDilda responded the access is <br />should be taken no further. He acknowled <br /> <br />Is. He <br /> will <br /> <br />:ess is already there and <br /> the access as it is. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon referred to the <br />when a plat dead ends, there .i,s~:~orary <br />year; there is no time limfl~.' !~'~':~dG~ the cul-( <br />and Junk~te. ,~,.:.. ;:~" !~Ji! i <br /> <br />Chai~erson Nixt mggested the <br />more appropriate. ...: ~:~c~:: <br /> <br /> cul-de-sac. He stated <br /> couldbe in place for 6 months, or a <br />is measured fi.om the intersection of 145~ <br /> <br />and Junkite. He stated this would be <br />regarding the double cul-de-sac and <br /> <br />suggested the to the confluence. <br /> <br />Principal: Pl.fi'i~e?: Tm~geon s~'~e measurement should be ~om the cent~line of ~e newest <br />intersection. ,:~...:,~?.. ~. .,,~ ?~ <br /> <br />Ji~:'.e'i~e,. ~433~ ~eon S[;-~.W.. pa,,,d out a memo ,ntit~ed "~e,O~ution for V~,e to <br />de-,~:2~h- ~ond, 2e~:~Xddition" ~d ,u~zed the point,. ~, noted ~,t a ~otion <br />pa,,ed U~'m~ Coun~il.a~:('~ei.' my t4, 2002 th.t re.d, '~o halt h. her tr.e ..mov.1 by ~oy.i <br />Oaks withifi?t~pe~i~ until a tree presemation ordinance is ~ place." He said he a~ees that <br />the tree removal;;n~edSto happen ~d he smd he is not dlsputmg that it should happen. <br /> <br />Motion by Chai~erson Nixt, seconded by Board Memb~ Kociscak, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, Brauer, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 15 <br /> <br />-15- <br /> <br /> <br />